Non-linear asymmetric gap models of residential satisfaction: formulation and empirical evidence

Wen Jiang, Tao Feng (Corresponding author), Harry J.P. Timmermans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper proposes non-linear asymmetric gap–satisfaction models to assess the influence of the gap between aspirations and perceived residential attributes on residential satisfaction. Two variants of the residential gap are specified based on the difference and ratio between aspiration and reality. Besides the influence of residential gap, the interactions with social-demographics are incorporated in three specifications of gap–satisfaction relationship. Using empirical data collected from eight renovated historical blocks in two Chinese cities, the relative performances of the proposed gap models are compared with truncated linear symmetric gap models and traditional linear (absolute) difference models for housing, living environmental and neighbourhood attributes. The estimation results indicate that overall the non-linear asymmetric gap models outperform the linear gap models. The model fit for housing and living environmental attributes are very good. Satisfaction for housing attributes is predicted best with non-linear asymmetric gap ratio models, while the environmental attributes are best represented by non-linear asymmetric difference models. In case of the neighbourhood dimension, non-linear asymmetric gap ratio models show the best performance, while these models yield a good fit only for two attributes. The interaction effect of social-demographics is found to vary between residential attributes.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEnvironment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2020

Fingerprint

residential satisfaction
evidence
housing
interaction
attribute
performance

Keywords

  • Residential satisfaction
  • residential gap
  • aspiration

Cite this

@article{2df0ae8694f14828aa651b19d94f276a,
title = "Non-linear asymmetric gap models of residential satisfaction: formulation and empirical evidence",
abstract = "This paper proposes non-linear asymmetric gap–satisfaction models to assess the influence of the gap between aspirations and perceived residential attributes on residential satisfaction. Two variants of the residential gap are specified based on the difference and ratio between aspiration and reality. Besides the influence of residential gap, the interactions with social-demographics are incorporated in three specifications of gap–satisfaction relationship. Using empirical data collected from eight renovated historical blocks in two Chinese cities, the relative performances of the proposed gap models are compared with truncated linear symmetric gap models and traditional linear (absolute) difference models for housing, living environmental and neighbourhood attributes. The estimation results indicate that overall the non-linear asymmetric gap models outperform the linear gap models. The model fit for housing and living environmental attributes are very good. Satisfaction for housing attributes is predicted best with non-linear asymmetric gap ratio models, while the environmental attributes are best represented by non-linear asymmetric difference models. In case of the neighbourhood dimension, non-linear asymmetric gap ratio models show the best performance, while these models yield a good fit only for two attributes. The interaction effect of social-demographics is found to vary between residential attributes.",
keywords = "Residential satisfaction, residential gap, aspiration",
author = "Wen Jiang and Tao Feng and Timmermans, {Harry J.P.}",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1177/2399808318790251",
language = "English",
journal = "Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science",
issn = "2399-8083",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Non-linear asymmetric gap models of residential satisfaction

T2 - formulation and empirical evidence

AU - Jiang, Wen

AU - Feng, Tao

AU - Timmermans, Harry J.P.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - This paper proposes non-linear asymmetric gap–satisfaction models to assess the influence of the gap between aspirations and perceived residential attributes on residential satisfaction. Two variants of the residential gap are specified based on the difference and ratio between aspiration and reality. Besides the influence of residential gap, the interactions with social-demographics are incorporated in three specifications of gap–satisfaction relationship. Using empirical data collected from eight renovated historical blocks in two Chinese cities, the relative performances of the proposed gap models are compared with truncated linear symmetric gap models and traditional linear (absolute) difference models for housing, living environmental and neighbourhood attributes. The estimation results indicate that overall the non-linear asymmetric gap models outperform the linear gap models. The model fit for housing and living environmental attributes are very good. Satisfaction for housing attributes is predicted best with non-linear asymmetric gap ratio models, while the environmental attributes are best represented by non-linear asymmetric difference models. In case of the neighbourhood dimension, non-linear asymmetric gap ratio models show the best performance, while these models yield a good fit only for two attributes. The interaction effect of social-demographics is found to vary between residential attributes.

AB - This paper proposes non-linear asymmetric gap–satisfaction models to assess the influence of the gap between aspirations and perceived residential attributes on residential satisfaction. Two variants of the residential gap are specified based on the difference and ratio between aspiration and reality. Besides the influence of residential gap, the interactions with social-demographics are incorporated in three specifications of gap–satisfaction relationship. Using empirical data collected from eight renovated historical blocks in two Chinese cities, the relative performances of the proposed gap models are compared with truncated linear symmetric gap models and traditional linear (absolute) difference models for housing, living environmental and neighbourhood attributes. The estimation results indicate that overall the non-linear asymmetric gap models outperform the linear gap models. The model fit for housing and living environmental attributes are very good. Satisfaction for housing attributes is predicted best with non-linear asymmetric gap ratio models, while the environmental attributes are best represented by non-linear asymmetric difference models. In case of the neighbourhood dimension, non-linear asymmetric gap ratio models show the best performance, while these models yield a good fit only for two attributes. The interaction effect of social-demographics is found to vary between residential attributes.

KW - Residential satisfaction

KW - residential gap

KW - aspiration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052555987&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2399808318790251

DO - 10.1177/2399808318790251

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85052555987

JO - Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science

JF - Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science

SN - 2399-8083

ER -