No age thresholds in the emergency department: a retrospective cohort study on age differences

Caro Fuchs (Corresponding author), Bilge Çelik, Steffie H.A. Brouns, Uzay Kaymak, Harm R. Haak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Emergency care in elderly patients has gained attention by researchers due to high utilization rate and the importance of emergency services in elderly care. We examine if there is a clear age threshold between young and old patients at which there is a need for extra care and facilities in the emergency department. This retrospective cohort study uses emergency department (ED) data collected over the course of a year, containing information about 31,491 patient visits. The measured variables are treatment time, waiting time, number of tests, number of medical procedures, number of specialties involved and the patient’s length of stay on the ED. To examine the multivariate differences between different patient groups, the data set is split into eighteen age groups and a MANOVA analysis is conducted to compare group means. The results show that older patients tend to have a longer stay on the ED. They also require more medical tests, have higher resource utilization and admission rates to the hospital. When the patients are grouped according to life stages (<18, 18-39, 40-64 and 65), each life stage shows significantly different characteristics across all variables. To understand where these differences start, age bins of five years are analyzed and almost none of the consecutive groups are significantly different in any variable. A significant difference between all groups is observed when age interval of the bins is increased to 10 years. This indicates that although age has an effect on the patient’s treatment, a clear age threshold that identifies the group of elderly patients is not observable from emergency room variables. The results of this study show no clear age boundary between young and old patients. In other words, we could not find support for favoring the often-used age boundary of 65 over other boundaries (e.g. 60 or 70) to distinguish the group of elderly patients on the ED.

LanguageEnglish
Article numbere0210743
Number of pages11
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 30 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Bins
cohort studies
Hospital Emergency Service
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Emergency rooms
Patient treatment
Emergency services
Emergency Medical Services
Length of Stay
Emergencies
Age Groups
researchers
testing
Research Personnel

Cite this

@article{453b6135f4634e9f9d2d3b4f5190923b,
title = "No age thresholds in the emergency department: a retrospective cohort study on age differences",
abstract = "Emergency care in elderly patients has gained attention by researchers due to high utilization rate and the importance of emergency services in elderly care. We examine if there is a clear age threshold between young and old patients at which there is a need for extra care and facilities in the emergency department. This retrospective cohort study uses emergency department (ED) data collected over the course of a year, containing information about 31,491 patient visits. The measured variables are treatment time, waiting time, number of tests, number of medical procedures, number of specialties involved and the patient’s length of stay on the ED. To examine the multivariate differences between different patient groups, the data set is split into eighteen age groups and a MANOVA analysis is conducted to compare group means. The results show that older patients tend to have a longer stay on the ED. They also require more medical tests, have higher resource utilization and admission rates to the hospital. When the patients are grouped according to life stages (<18, 18-39, 40-64 and 65), each life stage shows significantly different characteristics across all variables. To understand where these differences start, age bins of five years are analyzed and almost none of the consecutive groups are significantly different in any variable. A significant difference between all groups is observed when age interval of the bins is increased to 10 years. This indicates that although age has an effect on the patient’s treatment, a clear age threshold that identifies the group of elderly patients is not observable from emergency room variables. The results of this study show no clear age boundary between young and old patients. In other words, we could not find support for favoring the often-used age boundary of 65 over other boundaries (e.g. 60 or 70) to distinguish the group of elderly patients on the ED.",
author = "Caro Fuchs and Bilge {\cC}elik and Brouns, {Steffie H.A.} and Uzay Kaymak and Haak, {Harm R.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0210743",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "1",

}

No age thresholds in the emergency department : a retrospective cohort study on age differences. / Fuchs, Caro (Corresponding author); Çelik, Bilge; Brouns, Steffie H.A.; Kaymak, Uzay; Haak, Harm R.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 14, No. 1, e0210743, 30.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - No age thresholds in the emergency department

T2 - PLoS ONE

AU - Fuchs,Caro

AU - Çelik,Bilge

AU - Brouns,Steffie H.A.

AU - Kaymak,Uzay

AU - Haak,Harm R.

PY - 2019/1/30

Y1 - 2019/1/30

N2 - Emergency care in elderly patients has gained attention by researchers due to high utilization rate and the importance of emergency services in elderly care. We examine if there is a clear age threshold between young and old patients at which there is a need for extra care and facilities in the emergency department. This retrospective cohort study uses emergency department (ED) data collected over the course of a year, containing information about 31,491 patient visits. The measured variables are treatment time, waiting time, number of tests, number of medical procedures, number of specialties involved and the patient’s length of stay on the ED. To examine the multivariate differences between different patient groups, the data set is split into eighteen age groups and a MANOVA analysis is conducted to compare group means. The results show that older patients tend to have a longer stay on the ED. They also require more medical tests, have higher resource utilization and admission rates to the hospital. When the patients are grouped according to life stages (<18, 18-39, 40-64 and 65), each life stage shows significantly different characteristics across all variables. To understand where these differences start, age bins of five years are analyzed and almost none of the consecutive groups are significantly different in any variable. A significant difference between all groups is observed when age interval of the bins is increased to 10 years. This indicates that although age has an effect on the patient’s treatment, a clear age threshold that identifies the group of elderly patients is not observable from emergency room variables. The results of this study show no clear age boundary between young and old patients. In other words, we could not find support for favoring the often-used age boundary of 65 over other boundaries (e.g. 60 or 70) to distinguish the group of elderly patients on the ED.

AB - Emergency care in elderly patients has gained attention by researchers due to high utilization rate and the importance of emergency services in elderly care. We examine if there is a clear age threshold between young and old patients at which there is a need for extra care and facilities in the emergency department. This retrospective cohort study uses emergency department (ED) data collected over the course of a year, containing information about 31,491 patient visits. The measured variables are treatment time, waiting time, number of tests, number of medical procedures, number of specialties involved and the patient’s length of stay on the ED. To examine the multivariate differences between different patient groups, the data set is split into eighteen age groups and a MANOVA analysis is conducted to compare group means. The results show that older patients tend to have a longer stay on the ED. They also require more medical tests, have higher resource utilization and admission rates to the hospital. When the patients are grouped according to life stages (<18, 18-39, 40-64 and 65), each life stage shows significantly different characteristics across all variables. To understand where these differences start, age bins of five years are analyzed and almost none of the consecutive groups are significantly different in any variable. A significant difference between all groups is observed when age interval of the bins is increased to 10 years. This indicates that although age has an effect on the patient’s treatment, a clear age threshold that identifies the group of elderly patients is not observable from emergency room variables. The results of this study show no clear age boundary between young and old patients. In other words, we could not find support for favoring the often-used age boundary of 65 over other boundaries (e.g. 60 or 70) to distinguish the group of elderly patients on the ED.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060804137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0210743

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0210743

M3 - Article

VL - 14

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 1

M1 - e0210743

ER -