Networks on silicon: blessing or nightmare?

P. Wielage, K. Goossens

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Continuing VLSI technology scaling raises several deep submicron (DSM) problems like relatively slow interconnect, power dissipation and distribution, and signal integrity. Those problems are encountered particularly on long wires for global interconnect. As clock frequencies increase, scaled wires become relatively slower and on-chip communication will be the limiting performance factor of future chips. We explain why efficiently sharing of the wires for long distance communication is the solution to this problem. We introduce networks on silicon (NoS), that route packets over shared (semi)-global wires. NoS performance is expected to be high, but comes at a cost. Balancing the performance and cost of a NoS is a major challenge, and we believe busses still have a role to play.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings - Euromicro Symposium on Digital System Design
Subtitle of host publicationArchitectures, Methods and Tools, DSD 2002
EditorsMartyn Edwards
Place of PublicationPiscataway
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Pages196-200
Number of pages5
ISBN (Electronic)0-7695-1790-0
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2002
Externally publishedYes
Event5th Euromicro Symposium on Digital Systems Design (DSD 2002) - Dortmund, Germany
Duration: 4 Sept 20026 Sept 2002
Conference number: 5

Conference

Conference5th Euromicro Symposium on Digital Systems Design (DSD 2002)
Abbreviated titleDSD 2002
Country/TerritoryGermany
CityDortmund
Period4/09/026/09/02
Other"Architectures, Methods and Tools"

Keywords

  • Bandwidth
  • Clocks
  • Costs
  • Delay effects
  • Laboratories
  • Moore's Law
  • Silicon
  • Very large scale integration
  • Wires
  • Wiring

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Networks on silicon: blessing or nightmare?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this