Modelling coupled heat and airflow: ping-pong vs onions

J.L.M. Hensen

Modelling coupled heat and airflow: ping-pong vs onions

J.L.M. Hensen

Building Performance

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

By means of a case study involving a severe case of coupled heat and air flow in buildings, this paper aims to quantify the differences resulting from different methods (ping-pong and onion approach) for linking heat and air flow models. The main conclusion is that when used improperly, the onion method will have implications in terms of computing resources, but - more seriously - the ping-pong method may generate substantial errors.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proc. 16th Conf. Implementing the Results of Ventilation Research
Place of Publication	Palm Spring
Publisher	Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre (AIVC )
Pages	253-262
Publication status	Published - 1995
Event	16th Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre (AIVC) Conference - Palm Springs, United States Duration: 18 Sept 1995 → 22 Sept 1995

Conference

Conference	16th Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre (AIVC) Conference
Country/Territory	United States
City	Palm Springs
Period	18/09/95 → 22/09/95

Cite this

@inproceedings{f4d28d62fb754ea097f80112e1395573,

title = "Modelling coupled heat and airflow: ping-pong vs onions",

abstract = "By means of a case study involving a severe case of coupled heat and air flow in buildings, this paper aims to quantify the differences resulting from different methods (ping-pong and onion approach) for linking heat and air flow models. The main conclusion is that when used improperly, the onion method will have implications in terms of computing resources, but - more seriously - the ping-pong method may generate substantial errors.",

author = "J.L.M. Hensen",

year = "1995",

language = "English",

pages = "253--262",

booktitle = "Proc. 16th Conf. Implementing the Results of Ventilation Research",

publisher = "Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre (AIVC )",

note = "16th Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre (AIVC) Conference ; Conference date: 18-09-1995 Through 22-09-1995",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Modelling coupled heat and airflow: ping-pong vs onions

AU - Hensen, J.L.M.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - By means of a case study involving a severe case of coupled heat and air flow in buildings, this paper aims to quantify the differences resulting from different methods (ping-pong and onion approach) for linking heat and air flow models. The main conclusion is that when used improperly, the onion method will have implications in terms of computing resources, but - more seriously - the ping-pong method may generate substantial errors.

AB - By means of a case study involving a severe case of coupled heat and air flow in buildings, this paper aims to quantify the differences resulting from different methods (ping-pong and onion approach) for linking heat and air flow models. The main conclusion is that when used improperly, the onion method will have implications in terms of computing resources, but - more seriously - the ping-pong method may generate substantial errors.

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 253

EP - 262

BT - Proc. 16th Conf. Implementing the Results of Ventilation Research

PB - Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre (AIVC )

CY - Palm Spring

T2 - 16th Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre (AIVC) Conference

Y2 - 18 September 1995 through 22 September 1995

ER -

Modelling coupled heat and airflow: ping-pong vs onions

Abstract

Conference

Fingerprint

Cite this