Modeling bounded rationality in choice behavior: Relative utility vs. random regret models

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademic

1 Citation (Scopus)
236 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

To better understand individuals’ decision behavior, bounded rational decision models are getting increasingly more attention. This paper reviews relative utility and random regret models, which both assert that the performance of the considered alternative is dependent on the attributes of one or more foregone alternatives in the choice set. This property of the models is called context dependency. Differences and similarities between the models are outlined, new developments and applications are presented and finally future improvements are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication13th International Conference on Design and Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning
EditorsHarry Timmermans
Number of pages10
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Event13th International Conference on Design and Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning, DDSS 2016 - PSV Stadion, Eindhoven, Netherlands
Duration: 27 Jun 201628 Jun 2016
Conference number: 13
http://2016.ddss.nl/index.menu/intro
http://2016.ddss.nl/

Conference

Conference13th International Conference on Design and Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning, DDSS 2016
Abbreviated titleDDSS 2016
CountryNetherlands
CityEindhoven
Period27/06/1628/06/16
Internet address

Fingerprint

Modeling
Bounded rationality
Choice behavior
Decision model
Choice sets

Cite this

Pan, X., Rasouli, S., & Timmermans, H. J. P. (2016). Modeling bounded rationality in choice behavior: Relative utility vs. random regret models. In H. Timmermans (Ed.), 13th International Conference on Design and Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning
Pan, X. ; Rasouli, S. ; Timmermans, H.J.P. / Modeling bounded rationality in choice behavior: Relative utility vs. random regret models. 13th International Conference on Design and Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning. editor / Harry Timmermans. 2016.
@inproceedings{301d660905da4af1bce9e776d9dd6ae3,
title = "Modeling bounded rationality in choice behavior: Relative utility vs. random regret models",
abstract = "To better understand individuals’ decision behavior, bounded rational decision models are getting increasingly more attention. This paper reviews relative utility and random regret models, which both assert that the performance of the considered alternative is dependent on the attributes of one or more foregone alternatives in the choice set. This property of the models is called context dependency. Differences and similarities between the models are outlined, new developments and applications are presented and finally future improvements are discussed.",
author = "X. Pan and S. Rasouli and H.J.P. Timmermans",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
editor = "Harry Timmermans",
booktitle = "13th International Conference on Design and Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning",

}

Pan, X, Rasouli, S & Timmermans, HJP 2016, Modeling bounded rationality in choice behavior: Relative utility vs. random regret models. in H Timmermans (ed.), 13th International Conference on Design and Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning. 13th International Conference on Design and Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning, DDSS 2016, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 27/06/16.

Modeling bounded rationality in choice behavior: Relative utility vs. random regret models. / Pan, X.; Rasouli, S.; Timmermans, H.J.P.

13th International Conference on Design and Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning. ed. / Harry Timmermans. 2016.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademic

TY - GEN

T1 - Modeling bounded rationality in choice behavior: Relative utility vs. random regret models

AU - Pan, X.

AU - Rasouli, S.

AU - Timmermans, H.J.P.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - To better understand individuals’ decision behavior, bounded rational decision models are getting increasingly more attention. This paper reviews relative utility and random regret models, which both assert that the performance of the considered alternative is dependent on the attributes of one or more foregone alternatives in the choice set. This property of the models is called context dependency. Differences and similarities between the models are outlined, new developments and applications are presented and finally future improvements are discussed.

AB - To better understand individuals’ decision behavior, bounded rational decision models are getting increasingly more attention. This paper reviews relative utility and random regret models, which both assert that the performance of the considered alternative is dependent on the attributes of one or more foregone alternatives in the choice set. This property of the models is called context dependency. Differences and similarities between the models are outlined, new developments and applications are presented and finally future improvements are discussed.

M3 - Conference contribution

BT - 13th International Conference on Design and Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning

A2 - Timmermans, Harry

ER -

Pan X, Rasouli S, Timmermans HJP. Modeling bounded rationality in choice behavior: Relative utility vs. random regret models. In Timmermans H, editor, 13th International Conference on Design and Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning. 2016