Abstract
Artificial intelligence is currently changing many areas of society. Especially in health, where critical decisions are made, questions of control must be renegotiated: who is in control when an automated system makes clinically relevant decisions? Increasingly, the concept of meaningful human control (MHC) is being invoked for this purpose. However, it is unclear exactly how this concept is to be understood in health. Through a systematic review, we present the current state of the concept of MHC in health. The results show that there is not yet a robust MHC concept for health. We propose a broader understanding of MHC along three strands of action: enabling, exercising and evaluating control. Taking into account these strands of action and the established rules and processes in the different health sectors, the MHC concept needs to be further developed to avoid falling into two gaps, which we have described as theoretical and labelling gaps.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | e50-e58 |
| Journal | Journal of Medical Ethics |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue number | e1 |
| Early online date | 20 Sept 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Decision-making
- Ethics
- Delivery of Health Care/ethics
- Humans
- Artificial Intelligence/ethics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Meaningful Human Control over AI for Health? A Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver