Material meanings: ‘waste’ as a performative category of land in colonial India

Evelien de Hoop, Saurabh Arora

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Nearly seven decades after ‘decolonization’, policymaking in India continues to be haunted by colonial categories. Focusing on the category ‘wastelands’, which has been central to recent debates on India's biofuel policies, we study how it was heterogeneously constituted during the Permanent Settlement of land revenue in late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century colonial India. In particular, we trace how this category took on multiple meanings through its encounters with different human and nonhuman entities in disparate spatio-temporal settings. The entities encountered included not only ideas and moralities derived from theoretical notions such as Locke's ‘natural rights’, but also the soil and water on diverse lands, and the beings living or made to live on these lands. The multiple meanings of the category led to debates and controversies between colonial administrators regarding the ways in which the Permanent Settlement should be introduced and extended. By mapping these debates and controversies, we attempt to accomplish two things. First, we construct a narrative in which dominant colonial categories and associated rules do not possess unidirectional power to reformat colonized realities and practices. Second, we attempt to account for and recognize realities and practices that were marginalized or disregarded in the formulation of colonial administrative rules. Narratives such as ours, we hope, can help proliferate possibilities for enacting new decolonial and decolonizing practices of making, using and transforming meanings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)82-92
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Historical Geography
Volume55
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

India
decolonization
wasteland
morality
nineteenth century
biofuel
narrative
policy studies
revenue
material
land
Colonial India
soil
water
Colonies
Entity
rights
policy

Keywords

  • Actor-network theory
  • Colonial categories
  • Environmental history
  • History of ideas
  • Landscapes
  • Permanent settlement
  • South Asia

Cite this

@article{ad5f3e7addcf42668ffd785aa7fa43f6,
title = "Material meanings: ‘waste’ as a performative category of land in colonial India",
abstract = "Nearly seven decades after ‘decolonization’, policymaking in India continues to be haunted by colonial categories. Focusing on the category ‘wastelands’, which has been central to recent debates on India's biofuel policies, we study how it was heterogeneously constituted during the Permanent Settlement of land revenue in late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century colonial India. In particular, we trace how this category took on multiple meanings through its encounters with different human and nonhuman entities in disparate spatio-temporal settings. The entities encountered included not only ideas and moralities derived from theoretical notions such as Locke's ‘natural rights’, but also the soil and water on diverse lands, and the beings living or made to live on these lands. The multiple meanings of the category led to debates and controversies between colonial administrators regarding the ways in which the Permanent Settlement should be introduced and extended. By mapping these debates and controversies, we attempt to accomplish two things. First, we construct a narrative in which dominant colonial categories and associated rules do not possess unidirectional power to reformat colonized realities and practices. Second, we attempt to account for and recognize realities and practices that were marginalized or disregarded in the formulation of colonial administrative rules. Narratives such as ours, we hope, can help proliferate possibilities for enacting new decolonial and decolonizing practices of making, using and transforming meanings.",
keywords = "Actor-network theory, Colonial categories, Environmental history, History of ideas, Landscapes, Permanent settlement, South Asia",
author = "{de Hoop}, Evelien and Saurabh Arora",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhg.2016.10.001",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "82--92",
journal = "Journal of Historical Geography",
issn = "0305-7488",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Material meanings : ‘waste’ as a performative category of land in colonial India. / de Hoop, Evelien; Arora, Saurabh.

In: Journal of Historical Geography, Vol. 55, 01.01.2017, p. 82-92.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Material meanings

T2 - ‘waste’ as a performative category of land in colonial India

AU - de Hoop, Evelien

AU - Arora, Saurabh

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Nearly seven decades after ‘decolonization’, policymaking in India continues to be haunted by colonial categories. Focusing on the category ‘wastelands’, which has been central to recent debates on India's biofuel policies, we study how it was heterogeneously constituted during the Permanent Settlement of land revenue in late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century colonial India. In particular, we trace how this category took on multiple meanings through its encounters with different human and nonhuman entities in disparate spatio-temporal settings. The entities encountered included not only ideas and moralities derived from theoretical notions such as Locke's ‘natural rights’, but also the soil and water on diverse lands, and the beings living or made to live on these lands. The multiple meanings of the category led to debates and controversies between colonial administrators regarding the ways in which the Permanent Settlement should be introduced and extended. By mapping these debates and controversies, we attempt to accomplish two things. First, we construct a narrative in which dominant colonial categories and associated rules do not possess unidirectional power to reformat colonized realities and practices. Second, we attempt to account for and recognize realities and practices that were marginalized or disregarded in the formulation of colonial administrative rules. Narratives such as ours, we hope, can help proliferate possibilities for enacting new decolonial and decolonizing practices of making, using and transforming meanings.

AB - Nearly seven decades after ‘decolonization’, policymaking in India continues to be haunted by colonial categories. Focusing on the category ‘wastelands’, which has been central to recent debates on India's biofuel policies, we study how it was heterogeneously constituted during the Permanent Settlement of land revenue in late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century colonial India. In particular, we trace how this category took on multiple meanings through its encounters with different human and nonhuman entities in disparate spatio-temporal settings. The entities encountered included not only ideas and moralities derived from theoretical notions such as Locke's ‘natural rights’, but also the soil and water on diverse lands, and the beings living or made to live on these lands. The multiple meanings of the category led to debates and controversies between colonial administrators regarding the ways in which the Permanent Settlement should be introduced and extended. By mapping these debates and controversies, we attempt to accomplish two things. First, we construct a narrative in which dominant colonial categories and associated rules do not possess unidirectional power to reformat colonized realities and practices. Second, we attempt to account for and recognize realities and practices that were marginalized or disregarded in the formulation of colonial administrative rules. Narratives such as ours, we hope, can help proliferate possibilities for enacting new decolonial and decolonizing practices of making, using and transforming meanings.

KW - Actor-network theory

KW - Colonial categories

KW - Environmental history

KW - History of ideas

KW - Landscapes

KW - Permanent settlement

KW - South Asia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008178699&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhg.2016.10.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jhg.2016.10.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85008178699

VL - 55

SP - 82

EP - 92

JO - Journal of Historical Geography

JF - Journal of Historical Geography

SN - 0305-7488

ER -