Mass transfer studies on the dehydration of supercritical carbon dioxide using dense polymeric membranes

Andrew Shamu, Henk Miedema, Sybrand J. Metz, Zandrie Borneman, Kitty Nijmeijer (Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
41 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Continuous drying processes using supercritical CO2 (scCO2) as a water extraction agent require 24/7 operational dehydration units for scCO2 regeneration. Dehydration units using dense polymeric membranes are considered a cost effective, sustainable alternative to the current zeolite-based units. The focus of previous studies on the membrane-based dehydration of scCO2 was always on the membrane itself whereas boundary layer effects, e.g., concentration polarization, were not taken into account. To quantify the boundary layer effects, simulations were performed using three different membrane materials: SPEEK, Nafion® 117, and PEBAX® 1074. Process conditions during the simulations ranged from 8.0 to 18.0 MPa and 40 to 100 °C. Even though the three types of membranes examined differ in their H2O permeability and H2O over CO2 selectivity, in all cases 80% of the total mass-transfer resistance can be assigned to concentration polarization effects, making it the dominant parameter for water transport. Despite high but differing intrinsic water permeabilities of all three membranes materials, the H2O transport, thus H2O flux through the membrane is significantly reduced by concentration polarization down to similar levels. This makes it necessary to use larger membrane areas, that result in higher CO2 fluxes. As a consequence, material selection is predominantly based on the ability to reject CO2. Optimization of process conditions other than membrane material is briefly discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)229-237
Number of pages9
JournalSeparation and Purification Technology
Volume209
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Polymeric membranes
Dehydration
Carbon Dioxide
Carbon dioxide
Mass transfer
Membranes
Polarization
Water
Boundary layers
Fluxes
Zeolites
Drying

Keywords

  • Carbon dioxide
  • Concentration polarization
  • Gas separation
  • Membranes
  • Supercritical fluids

Cite this

@article{a1df14888e474b6f96c46c5cdf1c8ad7,
title = "Mass transfer studies on the dehydration of supercritical carbon dioxide using dense polymeric membranes",
abstract = "Continuous drying processes using supercritical CO2 (scCO2) as a water extraction agent require 24/7 operational dehydration units for scCO2 regeneration. Dehydration units using dense polymeric membranes are considered a cost effective, sustainable alternative to the current zeolite-based units. The focus of previous studies on the membrane-based dehydration of scCO2 was always on the membrane itself whereas boundary layer effects, e.g., concentration polarization, were not taken into account. To quantify the boundary layer effects, simulations were performed using three different membrane materials: SPEEK, Nafion{\circledR} 117, and PEBAX{\circledR} 1074. Process conditions during the simulations ranged from 8.0 to 18.0 MPa and 40 to 100 °C. Even though the three types of membranes examined differ in their H2O permeability and H2O over CO2 selectivity, in all cases 80{\%} of the total mass-transfer resistance can be assigned to concentration polarization effects, making it the dominant parameter for water transport. Despite high but differing intrinsic water permeabilities of all three membranes materials, the H2O transport, thus H2O flux through the membrane is significantly reduced by concentration polarization down to similar levels. This makes it necessary to use larger membrane areas, that result in higher CO2 fluxes. As a consequence, material selection is predominantly based on the ability to reject CO2. Optimization of process conditions other than membrane material is briefly discussed.",
keywords = "Carbon dioxide, Concentration polarization, Gas separation, Membranes, Supercritical fluids",
author = "Andrew Shamu and Henk Miedema and Metz, {Sybrand J.} and Zandrie Borneman and Kitty Nijmeijer",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.seppur.2018.07.042",
language = "English",
volume = "209",
pages = "229--237",
journal = "Separation and Purification Technology",
issn = "1383-5866",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Mass transfer studies on the dehydration of supercritical carbon dioxide using dense polymeric membranes. / Shamu, Andrew; Miedema, Henk; Metz, Sybrand J.; Borneman, Zandrie; Nijmeijer, Kitty (Corresponding author).

In: Separation and Purification Technology, Vol. 209, 31.01.2019, p. 229-237.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mass transfer studies on the dehydration of supercritical carbon dioxide using dense polymeric membranes

AU - Shamu, Andrew

AU - Miedema, Henk

AU - Metz, Sybrand J.

AU - Borneman, Zandrie

AU - Nijmeijer, Kitty

PY - 2019/1/31

Y1 - 2019/1/31

N2 - Continuous drying processes using supercritical CO2 (scCO2) as a water extraction agent require 24/7 operational dehydration units for scCO2 regeneration. Dehydration units using dense polymeric membranes are considered a cost effective, sustainable alternative to the current zeolite-based units. The focus of previous studies on the membrane-based dehydration of scCO2 was always on the membrane itself whereas boundary layer effects, e.g., concentration polarization, were not taken into account. To quantify the boundary layer effects, simulations were performed using three different membrane materials: SPEEK, Nafion® 117, and PEBAX® 1074. Process conditions during the simulations ranged from 8.0 to 18.0 MPa and 40 to 100 °C. Even though the three types of membranes examined differ in their H2O permeability and H2O over CO2 selectivity, in all cases 80% of the total mass-transfer resistance can be assigned to concentration polarization effects, making it the dominant parameter for water transport. Despite high but differing intrinsic water permeabilities of all three membranes materials, the H2O transport, thus H2O flux through the membrane is significantly reduced by concentration polarization down to similar levels. This makes it necessary to use larger membrane areas, that result in higher CO2 fluxes. As a consequence, material selection is predominantly based on the ability to reject CO2. Optimization of process conditions other than membrane material is briefly discussed.

AB - Continuous drying processes using supercritical CO2 (scCO2) as a water extraction agent require 24/7 operational dehydration units for scCO2 regeneration. Dehydration units using dense polymeric membranes are considered a cost effective, sustainable alternative to the current zeolite-based units. The focus of previous studies on the membrane-based dehydration of scCO2 was always on the membrane itself whereas boundary layer effects, e.g., concentration polarization, were not taken into account. To quantify the boundary layer effects, simulations were performed using three different membrane materials: SPEEK, Nafion® 117, and PEBAX® 1074. Process conditions during the simulations ranged from 8.0 to 18.0 MPa and 40 to 100 °C. Even though the three types of membranes examined differ in their H2O permeability and H2O over CO2 selectivity, in all cases 80% of the total mass-transfer resistance can be assigned to concentration polarization effects, making it the dominant parameter for water transport. Despite high but differing intrinsic water permeabilities of all three membranes materials, the H2O transport, thus H2O flux through the membrane is significantly reduced by concentration polarization down to similar levels. This makes it necessary to use larger membrane areas, that result in higher CO2 fluxes. As a consequence, material selection is predominantly based on the ability to reject CO2. Optimization of process conditions other than membrane material is briefly discussed.

KW - Carbon dioxide

KW - Concentration polarization

KW - Gas separation

KW - Membranes

KW - Supercritical fluids

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050112121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.07.042

DO - 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.07.042

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85050112121

VL - 209

SP - 229

EP - 237

JO - Separation and Purification Technology

JF - Separation and Purification Technology

SN - 1383-5866

ER -