Local atlas selection and performance estimation in multi-atlas based segmentation

T.R. Langerak; U.A. Heide, van der; A.N.T.J. Kotte; F.F. Berendsen; J.P.W. Pluim

doi:10.1109/ISBI.2011.5872495

Local atlas selection and performance estimation in multi-atlas based segmentation

T.R. Langerak, U.A. Heide, van der, A.N.T.J. Kotte, F.F. Berendsen, J.P.W. Pluim

Medical Image Analysis

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In multi-atlas based segmentation, a new image is segmented by registering multiple atlas images and propagating the corresponding atlas segmentations. These propagated segmentations are then combined in a process called label fusion. This paper presents a new, local method that divides the propagated segmentations in multiple, user-definable regions. A label fusion process can then be applied to each of these regions separately and the end result can be constructed out of multiple partial results. The new method is compared to non-local label fusion methods, as well as with another local method called ALMAS. It is shown that local selection does not lead to a significant improvement in cases where existing methods already have a good result, but that our method significantly improves the result of atlas-based segmentation in cases where existing methods are less successful. © 2011 IEEE.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging : From Nano to Macro (ISBI'11), 30 March - 2 April 2011, Chicago, USA
Place of Publication	Piscataway
Publisher	Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Pages	669-672
ISBN (Print)	978-1-4244-4128-0
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2011.5872495
Publication status	Published - 2011

Access to Document

10.1109/ISBI.2011.5872495

Cite this

Langerak, T. R., Heide, van der, U. A., Kotte, A. N. T. J., Berendsen, F. F., & Pluim, J. P. W. (2011). Local atlas selection and performance estimation in multi-atlas based segmentation. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging : From Nano to Macro (ISBI'11), 30 March - 2 April 2011, Chicago, USA (pp. 669-672). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2011.5872495

Langerak, T.R. ; Heide, van der, U.A. ; Kotte, A.N.T.J. et al. / Local atlas selection and performance estimation in multi-atlas based segmentation. Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging : From Nano to Macro (ISBI'11), 30 March - 2 April 2011, Chicago, USA. Piscataway : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2011. pp. 669-672

@inproceedings{4f33a62ca8914dedab9bbea31d52a8f6,

title = "Local atlas selection and performance estimation in multi-atlas based segmentation",

abstract = "In multi-atlas based segmentation, a new image is segmented by registering multiple atlas images and propagating the corresponding atlas segmentations. These propagated segmentations are then combined in a process called label fusion. This paper presents a new, local method that divides the propagated segmentations in multiple, user-definable regions. A label fusion process can then be applied to each of these regions separately and the end result can be constructed out of multiple partial results. The new method is compared to non-local label fusion methods, as well as with another local method called ALMAS. It is shown that local selection does not lead to a significant improvement in cases where existing methods already have a good result, but that our method significantly improves the result of atlas-based segmentation in cases where existing methods are less successful. {\textcopyright} 2011 IEEE.",

author = "T.R. Langerak and {Heide, van der}, U.A. and A.N.T.J. Kotte and F.F. Berendsen and J.P.W. Pluim",

year = "2011",

doi = "10.1109/ISBI.2011.5872495",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-1-4244-4128-0",

pages = "669--672",

booktitle = "Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging : From Nano to Macro (ISBI'11), 30 March - 2 April 2011, Chicago, USA",

publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers",

address = "United States",

}

Langerak, TR, Heide, van der, UA, Kotte, ANTJ, Berendsen, FF & Pluim, JPW 2011, Local atlas selection and performance estimation in multi-atlas based segmentation. in Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging : From Nano to Macro (ISBI'11), 30 March - 2 April 2011, Chicago, USA. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, pp. 669-672. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2011.5872495

Local atlas selection and performance estimation in multi-atlas based segmentation. / Langerak, T.R.; Heide, van der, U.A.; Kotte, A.N.T.J. et al.

Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging : From Nano to Macro (ISBI'11), 30 March - 2 April 2011, Chicago, USA. Piscataway : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2011. p. 669-672.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Local atlas selection and performance estimation in multi-atlas based segmentation

AU - Langerak, T.R.

AU - Heide, van der, U.A.

AU - Kotte, A.N.T.J.

AU - Berendsen, F.F.

AU - Pluim, J.P.W.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - In multi-atlas based segmentation, a new image is segmented by registering multiple atlas images and propagating the corresponding atlas segmentations. These propagated segmentations are then combined in a process called label fusion. This paper presents a new, local method that divides the propagated segmentations in multiple, user-definable regions. A label fusion process can then be applied to each of these regions separately and the end result can be constructed out of multiple partial results. The new method is compared to non-local label fusion methods, as well as with another local method called ALMAS. It is shown that local selection does not lead to a significant improvement in cases where existing methods already have a good result, but that our method significantly improves the result of atlas-based segmentation in cases where existing methods are less successful. © 2011 IEEE.

AB - In multi-atlas based segmentation, a new image is segmented by registering multiple atlas images and propagating the corresponding atlas segmentations. These propagated segmentations are then combined in a process called label fusion. This paper presents a new, local method that divides the propagated segmentations in multiple, user-definable regions. A label fusion process can then be applied to each of these regions separately and the end result can be constructed out of multiple partial results. The new method is compared to non-local label fusion methods, as well as with another local method called ALMAS. It is shown that local selection does not lead to a significant improvement in cases where existing methods already have a good result, but that our method significantly improves the result of atlas-based segmentation in cases where existing methods are less successful. © 2011 IEEE.

U2 - 10.1109/ISBI.2011.5872495

DO - 10.1109/ISBI.2011.5872495

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 978-1-4244-4128-0

SP - 669

EP - 672

BT - Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging : From Nano to Macro (ISBI'11), 30 March - 2 April 2011, Chicago, USA

PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers

CY - Piscataway

ER -

Langerak TR, Heide, van der UA, Kotte ANTJ, Berendsen FF, Pluim JPW. Local atlas selection and performance estimation in multi-atlas based segmentation. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging : From Nano to Macro (ISBI'11), 30 March - 2 April 2011, Chicago, USA. Piscataway: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. 2011. p. 669-672 doi: 10.1109/ISBI.2011.5872495

Local atlas selection and performance estimation in multi-atlas based segmentation

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this