Abstract
Safety is often quantified by the number of traffic accidents and the severity of those accidents. A significant part of the causes of traffic accidents can be traced back to the driver. In recent years, there were several efforts to describe driver behaviour and its relation with risk, by evaluating the output of driving behaviour (i.e. behavioural indicators) using measures like speed, time headway, time to collision and lateral position. But what determines a situation to be critical or unsafe? This is the central research question in a new TNO project. Although there are established functions that describe the relationship between some of these indicators and the level of risk, they are still widely based on historical accident data, are usually not linked to their surroundings or to other behavioural indicators, seldom include temporal factors, and researchers have almost never reached consensus concerning critical values.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Advances in Human Aspects of Road and Rail Transportation |
| Editors | Neville A. Stanton |
| Place of Publication | Boca Rato |
| Publisher | CRC Press |
| Pages | 560-571 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781439871249 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781439871232 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Driver behaviour
- Individual level
- Safety criteria
- Surrogate measure
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Linking behavioural indicators to safety: what is safe driving and what is not?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver