Legal vs. ethical obligations – a comment on the EPSRC’s principles for robotics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

While the 2010 EPSRC principles for robotics state a set of five rules of what “should” be done, I argue they should differentiate between legal obligations and ethical demands. Only if we make this difference can we state clearly what the legal obligations already are, and what additional ethical demands we want to make. I provide suggestions how to revise the rules in this light and how to make them more structured.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)137-141
Number of pages5
JournalConnection Science
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Apr 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Robotics

Keywords

  • killer robots
  • legal obligation
  • principles of robotics
  • Robot ethics
  • robot law

Cite this

@article{afaf97864d424d53a030a57c2d6d96c1,
title = "Legal vs. ethical obligations – a comment on the EPSRC’s principles for robotics",
abstract = "While the 2010 EPSRC principles for robotics state a set of five rules of what “should” be done, I argue they should differentiate between legal obligations and ethical demands. Only if we make this difference can we state clearly what the legal obligations already are, and what additional ethical demands we want to make. I provide suggestions how to revise the rules in this light and how to make them more structured.",
keywords = "killer robots, legal obligation, principles of robotics, Robot ethics, robot law",
author = "M{\"u}ller, {Vincent C.}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/09540091.2016.1276516",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "137--141",
journal = "Connection Science",
issn = "0954-0091",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Legal vs. ethical obligations – a comment on the EPSRC’s principles for robotics. / Müller, Vincent C.

In: Connection Science, Vol. 29, No. 2, 03.04.2017, p. 137-141.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Legal vs. ethical obligations – a comment on the EPSRC’s principles for robotics

AU - Müller, Vincent C.

PY - 2017/4/3

Y1 - 2017/4/3

N2 - While the 2010 EPSRC principles for robotics state a set of five rules of what “should” be done, I argue they should differentiate between legal obligations and ethical demands. Only if we make this difference can we state clearly what the legal obligations already are, and what additional ethical demands we want to make. I provide suggestions how to revise the rules in this light and how to make them more structured.

AB - While the 2010 EPSRC principles for robotics state a set of five rules of what “should” be done, I argue they should differentiate between legal obligations and ethical demands. Only if we make this difference can we state clearly what the legal obligations already are, and what additional ethical demands we want to make. I provide suggestions how to revise the rules in this light and how to make them more structured.

KW - killer robots

KW - legal obligation

KW - principles of robotics

KW - Robot ethics

KW - robot law

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018640961&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09540091.2016.1276516

DO - 10.1080/09540091.2016.1276516

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85018640961

VL - 29

SP - 137

EP - 141

JO - Connection Science

JF - Connection Science

SN - 0954-0091

IS - 2

ER -