Left prefrontal neuronavigated electrode localization in tDCS: 10–20 EEG system versus MRI-guided neuronavigation

Sara De Witte, Debby Klooster, Josefien Dedoncker, Romain Duprat, Jonathan Remue, Chris Baeken

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) involves positioning two electrodes at specifically targeted locations on the human scalp. In neuropsychiatric research, the anode is often placed over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), while the cathode is positioned over a contralateral cephalic region above the eye, referred-to as the supraorbital region. Although the 10–20 EEG system is frequently used to locate the DLPFC, due to inter-subject brain variability, this method may lack accuracy. Therefore, we compared in forty participants left DLPFC-localization via the 10–20 EEG system to MRI-guided neuronavigation. In one participant, with individual electrode positions in close proximity to the mean electrode position across subjects, we also investigated whether distinct electrode localizations were associated with different tDCS-induced electrical field distributions. Furthermore, we aimed to examine which neural region is targeted when placing the reference-electrode on the right supraorbital region. Compared to the 10–20 EEG system, MRI-guided neuronavigation localizes the DLPFC-targeting anode more latero-posteriorly, targeting the middle prefrontal gyrus. tDCS-induced electric fields (n = 1) suggest that both localization methods induce significantly different electric fields in distinct brain regions. Considering the frequent application of tDCS as a neuropsychiatric treatment, an evaluation and direct comparison of the clinical efficacy of targeting methods is warranted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalPsychiatry Research. Neuroimaging
Volume274
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Apr 2018

Fingerprint

Neuronavigation
Electroencephalography
Electrodes
Prefrontal Cortex
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Brain
Scalp
Head

Keywords

  • 10–20 EEG system
  • Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
  • Electric field distribution
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Neuronavigation
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation

Cite this

De Witte, Sara ; Klooster, Debby ; Dedoncker, Josefien ; Duprat, Romain ; Remue, Jonathan ; Baeken, Chris. / Left prefrontal neuronavigated electrode localization in tDCS : 10–20 EEG system versus MRI-guided neuronavigation. In: Psychiatry Research. Neuroimaging. 2018 ; Vol. 274. pp. 1-6.
@article{3e40c2d44276473b845c2c7e85a9bfa6,
title = "Left prefrontal neuronavigated electrode localization in tDCS: 10–20 EEG system versus MRI-guided neuronavigation",
abstract = "Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) involves positioning two electrodes at specifically targeted locations on the human scalp. In neuropsychiatric research, the anode is often placed over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), while the cathode is positioned over a contralateral cephalic region above the eye, referred-to as the supraorbital region. Although the 10–20 EEG system is frequently used to locate the DLPFC, due to inter-subject brain variability, this method may lack accuracy. Therefore, we compared in forty participants left DLPFC-localization via the 10–20 EEG system to MRI-guided neuronavigation. In one participant, with individual electrode positions in close proximity to the mean electrode position across subjects, we also investigated whether distinct electrode localizations were associated with different tDCS-induced electrical field distributions. Furthermore, we aimed to examine which neural region is targeted when placing the reference-electrode on the right supraorbital region. Compared to the 10–20 EEG system, MRI-guided neuronavigation localizes the DLPFC-targeting anode more latero-posteriorly, targeting the middle prefrontal gyrus. tDCS-induced electric fields (n = 1) suggest that both localization methods induce significantly different electric fields in distinct brain regions. Considering the frequent application of tDCS as a neuropsychiatric treatment, an evaluation and direct comparison of the clinical efficacy of targeting methods is warranted.",
keywords = "10–20 EEG system, Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, Electric field distribution, Magnetic resonance imaging, Neuronavigation, Transcranial direct current stimulation",
author = "{De Witte}, Sara and Debby Klooster and Josefien Dedoncker and Romain Duprat and Jonathan Remue and Chris Baeken",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.pscychresns.2018.02.001",
language = "English",
volume = "274",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "Psychiatry Research. Neuroimaging",
issn = "0925-4927",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Left prefrontal neuronavigated electrode localization in tDCS : 10–20 EEG system versus MRI-guided neuronavigation. / De Witte, Sara; Klooster, Debby; Dedoncker, Josefien; Duprat, Romain; Remue, Jonathan; Baeken, Chris.

In: Psychiatry Research. Neuroimaging, Vol. 274, 30.04.2018, p. 1-6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Left prefrontal neuronavigated electrode localization in tDCS

T2 - 10–20 EEG system versus MRI-guided neuronavigation

AU - De Witte, Sara

AU - Klooster, Debby

AU - Dedoncker, Josefien

AU - Duprat, Romain

AU - Remue, Jonathan

AU - Baeken, Chris

PY - 2018/4/30

Y1 - 2018/4/30

N2 - Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) involves positioning two electrodes at specifically targeted locations on the human scalp. In neuropsychiatric research, the anode is often placed over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), while the cathode is positioned over a contralateral cephalic region above the eye, referred-to as the supraorbital region. Although the 10–20 EEG system is frequently used to locate the DLPFC, due to inter-subject brain variability, this method may lack accuracy. Therefore, we compared in forty participants left DLPFC-localization via the 10–20 EEG system to MRI-guided neuronavigation. In one participant, with individual electrode positions in close proximity to the mean electrode position across subjects, we also investigated whether distinct electrode localizations were associated with different tDCS-induced electrical field distributions. Furthermore, we aimed to examine which neural region is targeted when placing the reference-electrode on the right supraorbital region. Compared to the 10–20 EEG system, MRI-guided neuronavigation localizes the DLPFC-targeting anode more latero-posteriorly, targeting the middle prefrontal gyrus. tDCS-induced electric fields (n = 1) suggest that both localization methods induce significantly different electric fields in distinct brain regions. Considering the frequent application of tDCS as a neuropsychiatric treatment, an evaluation and direct comparison of the clinical efficacy of targeting methods is warranted.

AB - Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) involves positioning two electrodes at specifically targeted locations on the human scalp. In neuropsychiatric research, the anode is often placed over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), while the cathode is positioned over a contralateral cephalic region above the eye, referred-to as the supraorbital region. Although the 10–20 EEG system is frequently used to locate the DLPFC, due to inter-subject brain variability, this method may lack accuracy. Therefore, we compared in forty participants left DLPFC-localization via the 10–20 EEG system to MRI-guided neuronavigation. In one participant, with individual electrode positions in close proximity to the mean electrode position across subjects, we also investigated whether distinct electrode localizations were associated with different tDCS-induced electrical field distributions. Furthermore, we aimed to examine which neural region is targeted when placing the reference-electrode on the right supraorbital region. Compared to the 10–20 EEG system, MRI-guided neuronavigation localizes the DLPFC-targeting anode more latero-posteriorly, targeting the middle prefrontal gyrus. tDCS-induced electric fields (n = 1) suggest that both localization methods induce significantly different electric fields in distinct brain regions. Considering the frequent application of tDCS as a neuropsychiatric treatment, an evaluation and direct comparison of the clinical efficacy of targeting methods is warranted.

KW - 10–20 EEG system

KW - Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

KW - Electric field distribution

KW - Magnetic resonance imaging

KW - Neuronavigation

KW - Transcranial direct current stimulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041549511&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2018.02.001

DO - 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2018.02.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 29429773

AN - SCOPUS:85041549511

VL - 274

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Psychiatry Research. Neuroimaging

JF - Psychiatry Research. Neuroimaging

SN - 0925-4927

ER -