LED lighting across borders : exploring the plea for darkness and value-sensitive design with Libbrecht’s comparative philosophy model

Els Janssens; Taylor Stone; Xue Yu; Gunter Bombaerts

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-24021-9_10

LED lighting across borders : exploring the plea for darkness and value-sensitive design with Libbrecht’s comparative philosophy model

Els Janssens
, Taylor Stone
, Xue Yu
, Gunter Bombaerts

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Academic › peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

90 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This chapter discusses how a comparative philosophical model can contribute to both substantive and procedural values in energy policy. We discuss the substantive values in the mainstream light-emitting diodes (LEDs) debate and Taylor Stone’s alternative plea for darkness. We also explore Value Sensitive Design as a procedural approach. We conclude that the comparative philosophical model of Ulrich Libbrecht can appropriately broaden the set of substantive values used in VSD. We discuss the values of ‘by-itself-so’ and ‘alter-intentionality’, which come with the unforeseen necessity of accepting elements from other worldviews and of normativity in the procedural VSD approach.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Energy justice across borders
Editors	Gunter Bombaerts, Kirstin Jenkins, Yekeen A. Sanusi, Guoyu Wang
Place of Publication	Berlin
Publisher	Springer
Chapter	10
Pages	195-216
Number of pages	22
ISBN (Electronic)	978-3-030-24021-9
ISBN (Print)	978-3-030-24020-2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24021-9_10
Publication status	Published - 2020

Access to Document

10.1007/978-3-030-24021-9_10

publishers versionFinal published version, 459 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@inbook{529dfcce3cc04cdba0ed723b7d0312ea,

title = "LED lighting across borders : exploring the plea for darkness and value-sensitive design with Libbrecht{\textquoteright}s comparative philosophy model",

abstract = "This chapter discusses how a comparative philosophical model can contribute to both substantive and procedural values in energy policy. We discuss the substantive values in the mainstream light-emitting diodes (LEDs) debate and Taylor Stone{\textquoteright}s alternative plea for darkness. We also explore Value Sensitive Design as a procedural approach. We conclude that the comparative philosophical model of Ulrich Libbrecht can appropriately broaden the set of substantive values used in VSD. We discuss the values of {\textquoteleft}by-itself-so{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}alter-intentionality{\textquoteright}, which come with the unforeseen necessity of accepting elements from other worldviews and of normativity in the procedural VSD approach.",

author = "Els Janssens and Taylor Stone and Xue Yu and Gunter Bombaerts",

year = "2020",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-24021-9\_10",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-3-030-24020-2",

pages = "195--216",

editor = "Gunter Bombaerts and Kirstin Jenkins and Sanusi, \{Yekeen A.\} and Guoyu Wang",

booktitle = "Energy justice across borders",

publisher = "Springer",

address = "Germany",

}

LED lighting across borders : exploring the plea for darkness and value-sensitive design with Libbrecht’s comparative philosophy model. / Janssens, Els; Stone, Taylor; Yu, Xue et al.
Energy justice across borders. ed. / Gunter Bombaerts; Kirstin Jenkins; Yekeen A. Sanusi; Guoyu Wang. Berlin: Springer, 2020. p. 195-216.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Academic › peer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - LED lighting across borders : exploring the plea for darkness and value-sensitive design with Libbrecht’s comparative philosophy model

AU - Janssens, Els

AU - Stone, Taylor

AU - Yu, Xue

AU - Bombaerts, Gunter

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - This chapter discusses how a comparative philosophical model can contribute to both substantive and procedural values in energy policy. We discuss the substantive values in the mainstream light-emitting diodes (LEDs) debate and Taylor Stone’s alternative plea for darkness. We also explore Value Sensitive Design as a procedural approach. We conclude that the comparative philosophical model of Ulrich Libbrecht can appropriately broaden the set of substantive values used in VSD. We discuss the values of ‘by-itself-so’ and ‘alter-intentionality’, which come with the unforeseen necessity of accepting elements from other worldviews and of normativity in the procedural VSD approach.

AB - This chapter discusses how a comparative philosophical model can contribute to both substantive and procedural values in energy policy. We discuss the substantive values in the mainstream light-emitting diodes (LEDs) debate and Taylor Stone’s alternative plea for darkness. We also explore Value Sensitive Design as a procedural approach. We conclude that the comparative philosophical model of Ulrich Libbrecht can appropriately broaden the set of substantive values used in VSD. We discuss the values of ‘by-itself-so’ and ‘alter-intentionality’, which come with the unforeseen necessity of accepting elements from other worldviews and of normativity in the procedural VSD approach.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85079767226

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-24021-9_10

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-24021-9_10

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-030-24020-2

SP - 195

EP - 216

BT - Energy justice across borders

A2 - Bombaerts, Gunter

A2 - Jenkins, Kirstin

A2 - Sanusi, Yekeen A.

A2 - Wang, Guoyu

PB - Springer

CY - Berlin

ER -

LED lighting across borders : exploring the plea for darkness and value-sensitive design with Libbrecht’s comparative philosophy model

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this