Lady justice thinks unconsciously : unconscious thought can lead to more accurate justice judgments

J.R.C. Ham, K. Bos, van den, E.A. van Doorn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

38 Citations (Scopus)
8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this article, we argue that when forming justice judgments, unconscious thought can lead to more accurate justice judgments than both conscious thought and immediate judgment. In two experiments, participants formed justice judgments about complex job application procedures. Specifically, participants made comparative justice judgments (Experiment 1) or absolute justice judgments on rating scales (Experiment 2). In immediate judgment conditions, participants made a justice judgment immediately after reading the stimulus materials. In conscious thought conditions, participants consciously thought about their justice judgment for 3 minutes. In unconscious thought conditions, participants were distracted for 3 minutes and then reported their justice judgments. As predicted, findings of both experiments show that unconscious thinkers made the most accurate justice judgments. These results provide a new perspective on the social psychology of justice judgments and yield additional insight into unconscious thinking.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)509-521
Number of pages13
JournalSocial Cognition
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Social Justice
Unconscious (Psychology)
Job Application
Social Psychology
Reading

Cite this

@article{1233bbf931724e1884b9800cb4b3f440,
title = "Lady justice thinks unconsciously : unconscious thought can lead to more accurate justice judgments",
abstract = "In this article, we argue that when forming justice judgments, unconscious thought can lead to more accurate justice judgments than both conscious thought and immediate judgment. In two experiments, participants formed justice judgments about complex job application procedures. Specifically, participants made comparative justice judgments (Experiment 1) or absolute justice judgments on rating scales (Experiment 2). In immediate judgment conditions, participants made a justice judgment immediately after reading the stimulus materials. In conscious thought conditions, participants consciously thought about their justice judgment for 3 minutes. In unconscious thought conditions, participants were distracted for 3 minutes and then reported their justice judgments. As predicted, findings of both experiments show that unconscious thinkers made the most accurate justice judgments. These results provide a new perspective on the social psychology of justice judgments and yield additional insight into unconscious thinking.",
author = "J.R.C. Ham and {Bos, van den}, K. and {van Doorn}, E.A.",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1521/soco.2009.27.4.509",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "509--521",
journal = "Social Cognition",
issn = "0278-016x",
publisher = "Guilford Publications",
number = "4",

}

Lady justice thinks unconsciously : unconscious thought can lead to more accurate justice judgments. / Ham, J.R.C.; Bos, van den, K.; van Doorn, E.A.

In: Social Cognition, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2009, p. 509-521.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lady justice thinks unconsciously : unconscious thought can lead to more accurate justice judgments

AU - Ham, J.R.C.

AU - Bos, van den, K.

AU - van Doorn, E.A.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - In this article, we argue that when forming justice judgments, unconscious thought can lead to more accurate justice judgments than both conscious thought and immediate judgment. In two experiments, participants formed justice judgments about complex job application procedures. Specifically, participants made comparative justice judgments (Experiment 1) or absolute justice judgments on rating scales (Experiment 2). In immediate judgment conditions, participants made a justice judgment immediately after reading the stimulus materials. In conscious thought conditions, participants consciously thought about their justice judgment for 3 minutes. In unconscious thought conditions, participants were distracted for 3 minutes and then reported their justice judgments. As predicted, findings of both experiments show that unconscious thinkers made the most accurate justice judgments. These results provide a new perspective on the social psychology of justice judgments and yield additional insight into unconscious thinking.

AB - In this article, we argue that when forming justice judgments, unconscious thought can lead to more accurate justice judgments than both conscious thought and immediate judgment. In two experiments, participants formed justice judgments about complex job application procedures. Specifically, participants made comparative justice judgments (Experiment 1) or absolute justice judgments on rating scales (Experiment 2). In immediate judgment conditions, participants made a justice judgment immediately after reading the stimulus materials. In conscious thought conditions, participants consciously thought about their justice judgment for 3 minutes. In unconscious thought conditions, participants were distracted for 3 minutes and then reported their justice judgments. As predicted, findings of both experiments show that unconscious thinkers made the most accurate justice judgments. These results provide a new perspective on the social psychology of justice judgments and yield additional insight into unconscious thinking.

U2 - 10.1521/soco.2009.27.4.509

DO - 10.1521/soco.2009.27.4.509

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 509

EP - 521

JO - Social Cognition

JF - Social Cognition

SN - 0278-016x

IS - 4

ER -