Kant's universal law formula revisited

S. Nyholm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Kantians are increasingly deserting the universal law formula in favor of the humanity formula. The former, they argue, is open to various decisive objections; the two are not equivalent; and it is only by appealing to the human- ity formula that Kant can reliably generate substantive implications from his theory of an acceptable sort. These assessments of the universal law formula, which clash starkly with Kant’s own assessment of it, are based on various widely accepted interpretative assumptions. These assumptions, it is argued in this article, depend on misleading translations of key terms; selective attention to Kant’s concrete examples; not taking seriously Kant’s theoretical claims about the relations among his various ideas; and a failure to take into account Kant’s idiosyncratic definitions of key concepts. The article seeks to right these inter- pretative wrongs, and finds that the universal law formula is not open to many of the standard objections
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)280-299
Number of pages20
JournalMetaphilosophy
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2015

Keywords

  • Kant
  • laws of nature
  • maxims
  • the humanity formula
  • universal law formula

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Kant's universal law formula revisited'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this