Is labour market flexibility harmful to innovation?

A.H. Kleinknecht

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    103 Citations (Scopus)
    1 Downloads (Pure)


    In a neoclassical framework one can argue that unemployment can be reduced by means of institutional changes that allow for a better working of the labour market and, notably, by achieving downward wage flexibility. I argue that although various policy recommendations about removing labour market rigidities are indeed advantageous in the short trun, they are detrimental from a Schumpeterian perspective, since they discourage product and process innovation. Reduced innovation efforts will in turn weaken the supply-side strength of an economy. The paper explores the implications of Schumpeter's notion of creative destruction and of Schmookler's hypothesis of demand-pulled innovations, borrowing from recent empirical innovation research.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)387-396
    Number of pages10
    JournalCambridge Journal of Economics
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 1998


    Dive into the research topics of 'Is labour market flexibility harmful to innovation?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this