Intrapersonal heterogeneity in car-sharing decision-making processes by activity-travel contexts: A context-dependent latent class random utility–random regret model

Eleni Charoniti, Jinhee Kim (Corresponding author), Soora Rasouli, Harry J.P. Timmermans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper investigates stated preferences for car-sharing in the context of travel mode choice under conditions of uncertain travel times. In particular, the study focuses on heterogeneity in the decision-making process due to different activity-travel contexts such as time pressure, activity duration, and uncertain travel times. It is assumed that the contextual factors influence the decision rules that potential users adopt regarding the use of a shared car for a specific trip purpose. A context-dependent latent class model allowing for the random panel effect is estimated, in which the latent classes respectively represent utility maximization and regret minimization decision rules. The model employs the contextual factors as covariates of class membership probability. A stated choice experiment, in which car-sharing, own car and public transport serve as the choice alternatives, is used to estimate the model. Results indicate that the activity-travel contexts play an important role in accounting for heterogeneity in decision rules.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)501-511
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Sustainable Transportation
Volume15
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Activity-travel contexts
  • car-sharing
  • context-dependent latent class choice
  • uncertainty

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intrapersonal heterogeneity in car-sharing decision-making processes by activity-travel contexts: A context-dependent latent class random utility–random regret model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this