Abstract
For peritoneal metastases (PM), there are few curative treatment options, and they are only available for a select patient group. Recently, new therapies have been developed to deliver intraperitoneal chemotherapy for a prolonged period, suitable for a larger patient group. These drug delivery systems (DDSs) seem promising in the experimental setting. Many types of DDSs have been explored in a variety of animal models, using different cytostatics. This review aimed to provide an overview of animal studies using DDSs containing cytostatics for the treatment of gastro-intestinal PM and identify the most promising therapeutic combinations. The review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and Systematic Review Center for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) guidelines. The 35 studies included revealed similar results: using a cytostatic-loaded DDS to treat PM resulted in a higher median survival time (MST) and a lower intraperitoneal tumor load compared to no treatment or treatment with a ‘free’ cytostatic or an unloaded DDS. In 65% of the studies, the MST was significantly longer and in 24% the tumor load was significantly lower in the animals treated with cytostatic-loaded DDS. The large variety of experimental setups made it impossible to identify the most promising DDS-cytostatic combination. In most studies, the risk of bias was unclear due to poor reporting. Future studies should focus more on improving the clinical relevance of the experiments, standardizing the experimental study setup, and improving their methodological quality and reporting.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 541-579 |
Number of pages | 39 |
Journal | Clinical and Experimental Metastasis |
Volume | 39 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The manuscript was written by staff of the University of Maastricht, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven University of Technology, and UPyTher BV. UPyTher has an interest in bringing a DDS to the clinical setting and has a financial interest, hence also for their co-founders (Fransen and Dankers). De Hingh receives an unrestricted research funding from Rand and ROCHE, both paid to the institute (Maastricht University).
Funding
The manuscript was written by staff of the University of Maastricht, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven University of Technology, and UPyTher BV. UPyTher has an interest in bringing a DDS to the clinical setting and has a financial interest, hence also for their co-founders (Fransen and Dankers). De Hingh receives an unrestricted research funding from Rand and ROCHE, both paid to the institute (Maastricht University).
Keywords
- Animal experiments
- Drug delivery systems
- Intraperitoneal chemotherapy
- Peritoneal metastases
- Systematic review