Interorganisational project dynamics: A longitudinal study of perceptual distance and client-contractor collaborative relationships

H.J. Christian van der Krift (Corresponding author), Josette M.P. Gevers, Arjan J. van Weele

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
80 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Despite the importance of good collaborative relationships in interorganisational projects, clients and contractors often develop adversarial relationships due to perceptual distance about key project issues. In this case study research, we investigated how perceptual distance emerges and changes over time, and how the collaborative relationship between client and contractor develops alongside these dynamics. In this exploration, we built upon agency theory and stewardship theory as complementary perspectives for understanding client-contractor collaborative relationships. We gathered quantitative and qualitative data in two projects, conducting three assessments in about one year. We found that perceptual distance increased and decreased over time, and that a reduction was typically associated with the collaborative relationship being characterized by stewardship rather than agency. These findings suggest that a regular assessment and evaluation of partners’ perceptions of critical project issues is warranted to timely detect and counteract perceptual distance. Moreover, partners would best adopt a stewardship orientation to reduce perceptual distance, although this may take considerable effort given the distributive nature of many pre-project negotiations.
Original languageEnglish
Article number100698
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Purchasing and Supply Management
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2021

Keywords

  • projects
  • perceptual distance
  • collaborative relationship

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interorganisational project dynamics: A longitudinal study of perceptual distance and client-contractor collaborative relationships'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this