Abstract
The complexity of semiconductor manufacturing equipment is growing. This growth results in a complexity increase of the integration and test phase of these systems. Simply adding more test resources is not possible anymore, because of the cost involved. A better design of an integration and test strategy can help to optimize this hectic phase. However, methods to design and evaluate integration and test strategies for multi-disciplinary systems are hardly available. In this paper, we present a method to design and compare integration and test strategies. Following this method, an optimal integration and test strategy can be chosen from a set of possible strategies. A case has been performed where a system is integrated and tested using three different integration and test strategies: a time-to-market-driven strategy, a qualitydriven strategy and a combined quality and time-to-market strategy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | 16th Annual International Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering, INCOSE 2006 |
| Place of Publication | Red Hook, New York |
| Publisher | Curran Associates |
| Pages | 270-284 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-1-62276-929-2 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2006 |
| Event | 16th Annual International Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering, INCOSE 2006: Shining Light on the Tough Issues - Orlando, United States Duration: 10 Jul 2006 → 13 Jul 2006 Conference number: 16 |
Conference
| Conference | 16th Annual International Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering, INCOSE 2006 |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | INCOSE 2006 |
| Country/Territory | United States |
| City | Orlando |
| Period | 10/07/06 → 13/07/06 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Integration and test strategies for semiconductor manufacturing equipment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver