Innovation in the frontline: Exploring the relationship between role conflict, ideas for improvement, and employee service performance

J.J.L. Schepers, E.J. Nijssen, G.A.H. van der Heijden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Although practitioners and scholars recognize that frontline employees' (FLEs') performance may improve rather than suffer from role conflict, research has yet to show how firms can manage this complex process. This study proposes that employees' ideas for improvement are a crucial mediator in role conflict's positive influence on FLEs' service performance. A conditional process model was tested in two empirical studies with multisource data. Results show that role conflict positively influences service performance through the employee's ideas for improvement. Role conflict also has a direct negative effect on performance. Detailed moderating analyses, using a floodlight approach, show that role conflict's total effect on service performance is positive only when an employee's learning orientation and the manager's level of encouragement for improvement are aligned. In other cases role conflict does not affect, or can even seriously impair FLEs' service performance. This study is the first to demonstrate empirically how, and under what conditions, role conflict can lead to performance enhancement of FLEs. Our findings help marketing managers to leverage role conflict for service innovation and to serve customers better.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)797-817
JournalInternational Journal of Research in Marketing
Volume33
Issue number4
Early online date21 Feb 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Role conflict
Employees
Innovation
Service performance
Frontline employees
Managers
Process model
Employee performance
Service innovation
Enhancement
Leverage
Empirical study
Marketing
Mediator
Learning orientation

Keywords

  • Frontline employees
  • Ideas for improvement
  • Innovation
  • Learning orientation
  • Role conflict
  • Service performance

Cite this

@article{4feb529a44cf42f6bc820457797234b8,
title = "Innovation in the frontline: Exploring the relationship between role conflict, ideas for improvement, and employee service performance",
abstract = "Although practitioners and scholars recognize that frontline employees' (FLEs') performance may improve rather than suffer from role conflict, research has yet to show how firms can manage this complex process. This study proposes that employees' ideas for improvement are a crucial mediator in role conflict's positive influence on FLEs' service performance. A conditional process model was tested in two empirical studies with multisource data. Results show that role conflict positively influences service performance through the employee's ideas for improvement. Role conflict also has a direct negative effect on performance. Detailed moderating analyses, using a floodlight approach, show that role conflict's total effect on service performance is positive only when an employee's learning orientation and the manager's level of encouragement for improvement are aligned. In other cases role conflict does not affect, or can even seriously impair FLEs' service performance. This study is the first to demonstrate empirically how, and under what conditions, role conflict can lead to performance enhancement of FLEs. Our findings help marketing managers to leverage role conflict for service innovation and to serve customers better.",
keywords = "Frontline employees, Ideas for improvement, Innovation, Learning orientation, Role conflict, Service performance",
author = "J.J.L. Schepers and E.J. Nijssen and {van der Heijden}, G.A.H.",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.01.004",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "797--817",
journal = "International Journal of Research in Marketing",
issn = "0167-8116",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

Innovation in the frontline: Exploring the relationship between role conflict, ideas for improvement, and employee service performance. / Schepers, J.J.L.; Nijssen, E.J.; van der Heijden, G.A.H.

In: International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2016, p. 797-817.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Innovation in the frontline: Exploring the relationship between role conflict, ideas for improvement, and employee service performance

AU - Schepers, J.J.L.

AU - Nijssen, E.J.

AU - van der Heijden, G.A.H.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Although practitioners and scholars recognize that frontline employees' (FLEs') performance may improve rather than suffer from role conflict, research has yet to show how firms can manage this complex process. This study proposes that employees' ideas for improvement are a crucial mediator in role conflict's positive influence on FLEs' service performance. A conditional process model was tested in two empirical studies with multisource data. Results show that role conflict positively influences service performance through the employee's ideas for improvement. Role conflict also has a direct negative effect on performance. Detailed moderating analyses, using a floodlight approach, show that role conflict's total effect on service performance is positive only when an employee's learning orientation and the manager's level of encouragement for improvement are aligned. In other cases role conflict does not affect, or can even seriously impair FLEs' service performance. This study is the first to demonstrate empirically how, and under what conditions, role conflict can lead to performance enhancement of FLEs. Our findings help marketing managers to leverage role conflict for service innovation and to serve customers better.

AB - Although practitioners and scholars recognize that frontline employees' (FLEs') performance may improve rather than suffer from role conflict, research has yet to show how firms can manage this complex process. This study proposes that employees' ideas for improvement are a crucial mediator in role conflict's positive influence on FLEs' service performance. A conditional process model was tested in two empirical studies with multisource data. Results show that role conflict positively influences service performance through the employee's ideas for improvement. Role conflict also has a direct negative effect on performance. Detailed moderating analyses, using a floodlight approach, show that role conflict's total effect on service performance is positive only when an employee's learning orientation and the manager's level of encouragement for improvement are aligned. In other cases role conflict does not affect, or can even seriously impair FLEs' service performance. This study is the first to demonstrate empirically how, and under what conditions, role conflict can lead to performance enhancement of FLEs. Our findings help marketing managers to leverage role conflict for service innovation and to serve customers better.

KW - Frontline employees

KW - Ideas for improvement

KW - Innovation

KW - Learning orientation

KW - Role conflict

KW - Service performance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960194017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.01.004

DO - 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.01.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84960194017

VL - 33

SP - 797

EP - 817

JO - International Journal of Research in Marketing

JF - International Journal of Research in Marketing

SN - 0167-8116

IS - 4

ER -