Abstract
Wind flow modeling in urban areas is influenced by many uncertainties, such as geometric detailing, inflow and boundary conditions, numerical approach (RANS, LES, and DNS) and turbulence model. This study aims to investigate how the different inflow conditions that are usually adopted to simulate urban wind flows may affect the accuracy of the results. CFD simulations were performed on a selected urban area - “Quartiere La Venezia” in Livorno (Italy) - using a steady-state RANS approach. Two types of inflow profiles were considered for one wind direction (α = 240° from the North). Wind tunnel tests performed on the same urban model were used as a benchmark to validate the numerical simulations. Mean wind profiles at 25 locations were compared and the statistical performance in terms of four different metrics was quantified for both inflow conditions. The results show that slightly different inflow conditions can greatly affect the results in terms of mean wind speed and turbulent kinetic energy.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | 8th International Colloquium on Bluff Body Aerodynamics and Applications (BBAA VIII), 7-11 June 2016, Boston, USA |
Pages | 1-10 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Event | 8th International Colloquium on Bluff Body Aerodynamics and Applications (BBAA VIII), June 7-11, 2016, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA - Northeastern University, Boston, United States Duration: 7 Jun 2016 → 11 Jun 2016 Conference number: VIII http://www.northeastern.edu/bbaa8/ |
Conference
Conference | 8th International Colloquium on Bluff Body Aerodynamics and Applications (BBAA VIII), June 7-11, 2016, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | BBAA VIII |
Country/Territory | United States |
City | Boston |
Period | 7/06/16 → 11/06/16 |
Internet address |
Keywords
- CFD
- urban wind flow
- inflow conditions
- mean wind profiles
- statistical performance