TY - JOUR
T1 - Imaging Photoplethysmography (iPPG) in Head and Neck Reconstructive Surgery
T2 - A Novel Technique for Noninvasive Flap Perfusion Monitoring
AU - van der Stel, S.D.
AU - Lai, M.
AU - Groen, H.C.
AU - Dirven, R.
AU - Karakullukcu, M.B.
AU - Karssemakers, L.H.E.
AU - van Gastel, M.
AU - Hendriks, B.H.W.
AU - Ruers, T.J.M.
AU - Schreuder, W.H.
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Background: Evaluate imaging photoplethysmography (iPPG) as a novel noninvasive technique to assess flap perfusion in head and neck free flap reconstructive (FFR) surgeries. Methods: Intraoperative iPPG was performed in 17 patients undergoing FFR surgery. Imaging consisted of a 30-s video from which perfusion maps were extracted, providing detailed information about blood flow and pulsatility in the flap microvasculature. During each procedure, iPPG acquisitions were acquired representing distinct perfusion conditions of the flap (fully perfused/ischemic/reperfused). When possible, postoperative measurements were performed to assess flap recovery during the critical time period (3 days) and long-term follow-up (30 days). Results: Perfusion maps, displaying iPPG amplitude and delay times, correlated strongly (p < 0.001) with the perfusion status of the tissue. One case of postoperative thrombosis, leading to flap failure, was identified with iPPG. After surgical revision in this case, flap perfusion was restored and confirmed by iPPG. Postoperative follow-up imaging allowed for objective visualization of flap recovery short term (3 days) and up to 30 days after the surgical procedure. Conclusions: This study shows that iPPG is suitable for objective and noninvasive assessment of flap perfusion in head and neck FFR surgery. In addition, postoperative monitoring shows potential for assessing flap perfusion in patients with increased risk of postoperative complications.
AB - Background: Evaluate imaging photoplethysmography (iPPG) as a novel noninvasive technique to assess flap perfusion in head and neck free flap reconstructive (FFR) surgeries. Methods: Intraoperative iPPG was performed in 17 patients undergoing FFR surgery. Imaging consisted of a 30-s video from which perfusion maps were extracted, providing detailed information about blood flow and pulsatility in the flap microvasculature. During each procedure, iPPG acquisitions were acquired representing distinct perfusion conditions of the flap (fully perfused/ischemic/reperfused). When possible, postoperative measurements were performed to assess flap recovery during the critical time period (3 days) and long-term follow-up (30 days). Results: Perfusion maps, displaying iPPG amplitude and delay times, correlated strongly (p < 0.001) with the perfusion status of the tissue. One case of postoperative thrombosis, leading to flap failure, was identified with iPPG. After surgical revision in this case, flap perfusion was restored and confirmed by iPPG. Postoperative follow-up imaging allowed for objective visualization of flap recovery short term (3 days) and up to 30 days after the surgical procedure. Conclusions: This study shows that iPPG is suitable for objective and noninvasive assessment of flap perfusion in head and neck FFR surgery. In addition, postoperative monitoring shows potential for assessing flap perfusion in patients with increased risk of postoperative complications.
KW - free flap reconstruction
KW - head and neck cancer
KW - head and neck reconstructive surgery
KW - imaging photoplethysmography
KW - iPPG
KW - oral cancer
KW - perfusion monitoring
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85209072013&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/lsm.23859
DO - 10.1002/lsm.23859
M3 - Article
C2 - 39540240
AN - SCOPUS:85209072013
SN - 0196-8092
VL - 56
SP - 811
EP - 820
JO - Lasers in Surgery and Medicine
JF - Lasers in Surgery and Medicine
IS - 10
ER -