Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 895-909 |
| Journal | Journal of Software : Evolution and Process |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Cite this
}
Identifying criteria for multimodel software process improvement solutions : based on a review of current problems and initiatives. / Kelemen, Z.D.; Kusters, R.J.; Trienekens, J.J.M.
In: Journal of Software : Evolution and Process, Vol. 24, No. 8, 2012, p. 895-909.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Identifying criteria for multimodel software process improvement solutions : based on a review of current problems and initiatives
AU - Kelemen, Z.D.
AU - Kusters, R.J.
AU - Trienekens, J.J.M.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - In this article, we analyze current initiatives in multimodel software process improvement and identify criteria for multimodel solutions. With multimodel, we mean the simultaneous usage of more than one quality approach (e.g. standards, methods, techniques to improve software processes). This paper discusses first the current problems regarding the use of multiple software quality approaches. Subsequently, multimodel initiatives are categorized into three different groups, respectively: quality approach harmonization, quality approach integration, and quality approach mapping. Based on an analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of current multimodel initiatives in these three classes, we derive a set of criteria, which can provide a basis for multimodel software process improvement solutions. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
AB - In this article, we analyze current initiatives in multimodel software process improvement and identify criteria for multimodel solutions. With multimodel, we mean the simultaneous usage of more than one quality approach (e.g. standards, methods, techniques to improve software processes). This paper discusses first the current problems regarding the use of multiple software quality approaches. Subsequently, multimodel initiatives are categorized into three different groups, respectively: quality approach harmonization, quality approach integration, and quality approach mapping. Based on an analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of current multimodel initiatives in these three classes, we derive a set of criteria, which can provide a basis for multimodel software process improvement solutions. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
U2 - 10.1002/smr.549
DO - 10.1002/smr.549
M3 - Article
VL - 24
SP - 895
EP - 909
JO - Journal of Software : Evolution and Process
JF - Journal of Software : Evolution and Process
SN - 2047-7481
IS - 8
ER -