TY - JOUR
T1 - Hysteroscopic morcellation versus loop resection for removal of placental remnants
T2 - a randomized trial
AU - Hamerlynck, Tjalina W.O.
AU - van Vliet, Huib A.A.M.
AU - Beerens, Anne Sophie
AU - Weyers, Steven
AU - Schoot, Benedictus C.
PY - 2016/11/1
Y1 - 2016/11/1
N2 - Study Objective:To compare hysteroscopic morcellation with loop resection for the removal of placental remnants in terms of procedure time, adverse events, tissue availability, histology results, short-term effectiveness, and postoperative adhesions. Design A randomized controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification I). Setting A teaching and university hospital. Patients Women with placental remnants. Interventions Hysteroscopic morcellation with the TRUCLEAR 8.0 Tissue Removal System (Smith & Nephew, Inc, Andover, MA) or loop resection with a rigid 8.5-mm bipolar resectoscope (Karl Storz GmbH, Tuttlingen, Germany). Measurements and Main Results Forty-six and 40 women were included in the hysteroscopic morcellation and resection groups, respectively. The median operating time was significantly shorter for hysteroscopic morcellation compared with loop resection (6.2 minutes [interquartile range, 4.0–11.2 minutes] vs 10.0 minutes [5.8–16.4 minutes], p = .023). Both operating time and total procedure time, corrected for the diameter of the placental remnants, were significantly reduced for hysteroscopic morcellation compared with loop resection, by 40% (95% confidence interval, 15%–58%; p = .005) and 22% (95% CI, 5%–37%; p = .014), respectively. No adverse events occurred during hysteroscopic removal. Perforation at dilation in 8 cases of the hysteroscopic morcellation group resulted in 2 procedure discontinuations and 1 incomplete procedure. Incomplete removal was found in 1 uncomplicated hysteroscopic morcellation procedure and 2 resection procedures. Pathology results confirmed the presence of placental remnants in 27 of 40 (67.5%) and 26 of 37 (70%) patients in the hysteroscopic morcellation and resection groups, respectively. Second-look hysteroscopy showed de novo intrauterine adhesions in 1 of 35 patients (3%) in the hysteroscopic morcellation group and 1 of 30 (3%) patients in the resection group. Conclusion Hysteroscopic morcellation is a faster alternative than loop resection. Both techniques are safe and show high rates of complete removal and tissue availability and low rates of de novo intrauterine adhesions.
AB - Study Objective:To compare hysteroscopic morcellation with loop resection for the removal of placental remnants in terms of procedure time, adverse events, tissue availability, histology results, short-term effectiveness, and postoperative adhesions. Design A randomized controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification I). Setting A teaching and university hospital. Patients Women with placental remnants. Interventions Hysteroscopic morcellation with the TRUCLEAR 8.0 Tissue Removal System (Smith & Nephew, Inc, Andover, MA) or loop resection with a rigid 8.5-mm bipolar resectoscope (Karl Storz GmbH, Tuttlingen, Germany). Measurements and Main Results Forty-six and 40 women were included in the hysteroscopic morcellation and resection groups, respectively. The median operating time was significantly shorter for hysteroscopic morcellation compared with loop resection (6.2 minutes [interquartile range, 4.0–11.2 minutes] vs 10.0 minutes [5.8–16.4 minutes], p = .023). Both operating time and total procedure time, corrected for the diameter of the placental remnants, were significantly reduced for hysteroscopic morcellation compared with loop resection, by 40% (95% confidence interval, 15%–58%; p = .005) and 22% (95% CI, 5%–37%; p = .014), respectively. No adverse events occurred during hysteroscopic removal. Perforation at dilation in 8 cases of the hysteroscopic morcellation group resulted in 2 procedure discontinuations and 1 incomplete procedure. Incomplete removal was found in 1 uncomplicated hysteroscopic morcellation procedure and 2 resection procedures. Pathology results confirmed the presence of placental remnants in 27 of 40 (67.5%) and 26 of 37 (70%) patients in the hysteroscopic morcellation and resection groups, respectively. Second-look hysteroscopy showed de novo intrauterine adhesions in 1 of 35 patients (3%) in the hysteroscopic morcellation group and 1 of 30 (3%) patients in the resection group. Conclusion Hysteroscopic morcellation is a faster alternative than loop resection. Both techniques are safe and show high rates of complete removal and tissue availability and low rates of de novo intrauterine adhesions.
KW - Hysteroscopic morcellation
KW - Intrauterine adhesions
KW - Loop resection
KW - Placental remnants
KW - Randomized controlled trial
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992549252&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.828
DO - 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.828
M3 - Article
C2 - 27590568
AN - SCOPUS:84992549252
VL - 23
SP - 1172
EP - 1180
JO - Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
JF - Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
SN - 1553-4650
IS - 7
ER -