Human vs. Machine: Evaluation of Fluorescence Micrographs

T.W. Nattkemper, T. Twellmann, W. Schubert, H. Ritter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

53 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

To enable high-throughput screening of molecular phenotypes, multi-parameter fluorescence microscopy is applied. Object of our study is lymphocytes which invade human tissue. One important basis for our collaborative project is the development of methods for automatic and accurate evaluation of fluorescence micrographs. As a part of this, we focus on the question of how to measure the accuracy of microscope image interpretation, by human experts or a computer system. Following standard practice we use methods motivated by receiver operator characteristics to discuss the accuracies of human experts and of neural network-based algorithms. For images of good quality the algorithms achieve the accuracy of the medium-skilled experts. In images with increased noise, the classifiers are outperformed by some of the experts. Furthermore, the neural network-based cell detection is much faster than the human experts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)31-43
JournalComputers in Biology and Medicine
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Human vs. Machine: Evaluation of Fluorescence Micrographs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this