Human click-based echolocation of distance: superfine acuity and dynamic clicking behaviour

Lore Thaler (Corresponding author), H.P.J.C. de Vos, D. Kish, M. Antoniou, C.J. Baker, M.C.J. Hornikx

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Some people who are blind have trained themselves in echolocation using mouth clicks. Here, we provide the first report of psychophysical and clicking data during echolocation of distance from a group of 8 blind people with experience in mouth click-based echolocation (daily use for > 3 years). We found that experienced echolocators can detect changes in distance of 3 cm at a reference distance of 50 cm, and a change of 7 cm at a reference distance of 150 cm, regardless of object size (i.e. 28.5 cm vs. 80 cm diameter disk). Participants made mouth clicks that were more intense and they made more clicks for weaker reflectors (i.e. same object at farther distance, or smaller object at same distance), but number and intensity of clicks were adjusted independently from one another. The acuity we found is better than previous estimates based on samples of sighted participants without experience in echolocation or individual experienced participants (i.e. single blind echolocators tested) and highlights adaptation of the perceptual system in blind human echolocators. Further, the dynamic adaptive clicking behaviour we observed suggests that number and intensity of emissions serve separate functions to increase SNR. The data may serve as an inspiration for low-cost (i.e. non-array based) artificial ‘cognitive’ sonar and radar systems, i.e. signal design, adaptive pulse repetition rate and intensity. It will also be useful for instruction and guidance for new users of echolocation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)499-510
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
Volume20
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

Echolocation
Mouth
Radar
Psychological Adaptation
Heart Rate
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • audition
  • blindness
  • signal design
  • SNR
  • sonar

Cite this

Thaler, Lore ; de Vos, H.P.J.C. ; Kish, D. ; Antoniou, M. ; Baker, C.J. ; Hornikx, M.C.J. / Human click-based echolocation of distance : superfine acuity and dynamic clicking behaviour. In: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. 2019 ; Vol. 20, No. 5. pp. 499-510.
@article{e6d8c9c6729a4b83841bed9b1fd31de6,
title = "Human click-based echolocation of distance: superfine acuity and dynamic clicking behaviour",
abstract = "Some people who are blind have trained themselves in echolocation using mouth clicks. Here, we provide the first report of psychophysical and clicking data during echolocation of distance from a group of 8 blind people with experience in mouth click-based echolocation (daily use for > 3 years). We found that experienced echolocators can detect changes in distance of 3 cm at a reference distance of 50 cm, and a change of 7 cm at a reference distance of 150 cm, regardless of object size (i.e. 28.5 cm vs. 80 cm diameter disk). Participants made mouth clicks that were more intense and they made more clicks for weaker reflectors (i.e. same object at farther distance, or smaller object at same distance), but number and intensity of clicks were adjusted independently from one another. The acuity we found is better than previous estimates based on samples of sighted participants without experience in echolocation or individual experienced participants (i.e. single blind echolocators tested) and highlights adaptation of the perceptual system in blind human echolocators. Further, the dynamic adaptive clicking behaviour we observed suggests that number and intensity of emissions serve separate functions to increase SNR. The data may serve as an inspiration for low-cost (i.e. non-array based) artificial ‘cognitive’ sonar and radar systems, i.e. signal design, adaptive pulse repetition rate and intensity. It will also be useful for instruction and guidance for new users of echolocation.",
keywords = "audition, blindness, signal design, SNR, sonar",
author = "Lore Thaler and {de Vos}, H.P.J.C. and D. Kish and M. Antoniou and C.J. Baker and M.C.J. Hornikx",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10162-019-00728-0",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "499--510",
journal = "Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology",
issn = "1525-3961",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "5",

}

Human click-based echolocation of distance : superfine acuity and dynamic clicking behaviour. / Thaler, Lore (Corresponding author); de Vos, H.P.J.C.; Kish, D.; Antoniou, M.; Baker, C.J.; Hornikx, M.C.J.

In: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, Vol. 20, No. 5, 01.10.2019, p. 499-510.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Human click-based echolocation of distance

T2 - superfine acuity and dynamic clicking behaviour

AU - Thaler, Lore

AU - de Vos, H.P.J.C.

AU - Kish, D.

AU - Antoniou, M.

AU - Baker, C.J.

AU - Hornikx, M.C.J.

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - Some people who are blind have trained themselves in echolocation using mouth clicks. Here, we provide the first report of psychophysical and clicking data during echolocation of distance from a group of 8 blind people with experience in mouth click-based echolocation (daily use for > 3 years). We found that experienced echolocators can detect changes in distance of 3 cm at a reference distance of 50 cm, and a change of 7 cm at a reference distance of 150 cm, regardless of object size (i.e. 28.5 cm vs. 80 cm diameter disk). Participants made mouth clicks that were more intense and they made more clicks for weaker reflectors (i.e. same object at farther distance, or smaller object at same distance), but number and intensity of clicks were adjusted independently from one another. The acuity we found is better than previous estimates based on samples of sighted participants without experience in echolocation or individual experienced participants (i.e. single blind echolocators tested) and highlights adaptation of the perceptual system in blind human echolocators. Further, the dynamic adaptive clicking behaviour we observed suggests that number and intensity of emissions serve separate functions to increase SNR. The data may serve as an inspiration for low-cost (i.e. non-array based) artificial ‘cognitive’ sonar and radar systems, i.e. signal design, adaptive pulse repetition rate and intensity. It will also be useful for instruction and guidance for new users of echolocation.

AB - Some people who are blind have trained themselves in echolocation using mouth clicks. Here, we provide the first report of psychophysical and clicking data during echolocation of distance from a group of 8 blind people with experience in mouth click-based echolocation (daily use for > 3 years). We found that experienced echolocators can detect changes in distance of 3 cm at a reference distance of 50 cm, and a change of 7 cm at a reference distance of 150 cm, regardless of object size (i.e. 28.5 cm vs. 80 cm diameter disk). Participants made mouth clicks that were more intense and they made more clicks for weaker reflectors (i.e. same object at farther distance, or smaller object at same distance), but number and intensity of clicks were adjusted independently from one another. The acuity we found is better than previous estimates based on samples of sighted participants without experience in echolocation or individual experienced participants (i.e. single blind echolocators tested) and highlights adaptation of the perceptual system in blind human echolocators. Further, the dynamic adaptive clicking behaviour we observed suggests that number and intensity of emissions serve separate functions to increase SNR. The data may serve as an inspiration for low-cost (i.e. non-array based) artificial ‘cognitive’ sonar and radar systems, i.e. signal design, adaptive pulse repetition rate and intensity. It will also be useful for instruction and guidance for new users of echolocation.

KW - audition

KW - blindness

KW - signal design

KW - SNR

KW - sonar

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068876038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10162-019-00728-0

DO - 10.1007/s10162-019-00728-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 31286299

AN - SCOPUS:85068876038

VL - 20

SP - 499

EP - 510

JO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

JF - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

SN - 1525-3961

IS - 5

ER -