How to depolarise the ethical debate over human embryonic stem cell research (and other ethical debates too!)

N. Espinoza, M.B. Peterson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The contention of this paper is that the current ethical debate over embryonic stem cell research is polarised to an extent that is not warranted by the underlying ethical conflict. It is argued that the ethical debate can be rendered more nuanced, and less polarised, by introducing non-binary notions of moral rightness and wrongness. According to the view proposed, embryonic stem cell research-and possibly other controversial activities too-can be considered 'a little bit right and a little bit wrong'. If this idea were to become widely accepted, the ethical debate would, for conceptual reasons, become less polarised
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)496-500
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume38
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How to depolarise the ethical debate over human embryonic stem cell research (and other ethical debates too!)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this