How robust are the deviations in haptic parallelity?

Astrid M.L. Kappers, Albert Postma, Roderik F. Viergever

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Several studies have shown that physically parallel bars do not feel parallel and vice versa. The most plausible cause of this deviation is the biasing influence of an egocentric reference frame. The aim of the present study was to assess the strength of this egocentric contribution. The deviations from veridicality were measured in six experiments where subjects were presented with either haptic or visual information about parallelity or their deviations. It was found that even direct error feedback (either haptically or visually) did not even nearly result in veridical performance. The improvements found were attributed to a shift in focus towards a more allocentric reference frame, possibly reflecting the same mechanisms as found in delay and noninformative vision studies. We conclude that the illusionary percept of haptic parallelity is rather robust and is indeed caused by a strong reliance on an egocentric reference frame.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)15-24
JournalActa psychologica
Volume128
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'How robust are the deviations in haptic parallelity?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this