How healthy are software engineering conferences?

B.N. Vasilescu, A. Serebrenik, T. Mens, M.G.J. Brand, van den, E. Pek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this article we study the health of software engineering conferences by means of a suite of metrics created for this purpose. The metrics measure stability of the community, openness to new authors, introversion, representativeness of the PC with respect to the authors' community, availability of PC candidates, and scientific prestige. Using this metrics suite, we assess the health of 11 software engineering conferences over a period of more than 10 years. In general, our findings suggest that software engineering conferences are healthy, but we observe important differences between conferences with a wide scope and those with a more narrow scope. We also find that depending on the chosen health metric, some conferences perform better than others. This knowledge may be used by prospective authors to decide in which conferences to publish, and by conference steering committees or PC chairs to assess their selection process. Keywords: Scientometrics; Software engineering; Conferences; Empirical research
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)251-272
Number of pages22
JournalScience of Computer Programming
Volume89
Issue numberPart C
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Software engineering
Health
Availability

Cite this

Vasilescu, B.N. ; Serebrenik, A. ; Mens, T. ; Brand, van den, M.G.J. ; Pek, E. / How healthy are software engineering conferences?. In: Science of Computer Programming. 2014 ; Vol. 89, No. Part C. pp. 251-272.
@article{9734945dfeec4df09de4b342ab3c0f44,
title = "How healthy are software engineering conferences?",
abstract = "In this article we study the health of software engineering conferences by means of a suite of metrics created for this purpose. The metrics measure stability of the community, openness to new authors, introversion, representativeness of the PC with respect to the authors' community, availability of PC candidates, and scientific prestige. Using this metrics suite, we assess the health of 11 software engineering conferences over a period of more than 10 years. In general, our findings suggest that software engineering conferences are healthy, but we observe important differences between conferences with a wide scope and those with a more narrow scope. We also find that depending on the chosen health metric, some conferences perform better than others. This knowledge may be used by prospective authors to decide in which conferences to publish, and by conference steering committees or PC chairs to assess their selection process. Keywords: Scientometrics; Software engineering; Conferences; Empirical research",
author = "B.N. Vasilescu and A. Serebrenik and T. Mens and {Brand, van den}, M.G.J. and E. Pek",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.scico.2014.01.016",
language = "English",
volume = "89",
pages = "251--272",
journal = "Science of Computer Programming",
issn = "0167-6423",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "Part C",

}

How healthy are software engineering conferences? / Vasilescu, B.N.; Serebrenik, A.; Mens, T.; Brand, van den, M.G.J.; Pek, E.

In: Science of Computer Programming, Vol. 89, No. Part C, 2014, p. 251-272.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How healthy are software engineering conferences?

AU - Vasilescu, B.N.

AU - Serebrenik, A.

AU - Mens, T.

AU - Brand, van den, M.G.J.

AU - Pek, E.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - In this article we study the health of software engineering conferences by means of a suite of metrics created for this purpose. The metrics measure stability of the community, openness to new authors, introversion, representativeness of the PC with respect to the authors' community, availability of PC candidates, and scientific prestige. Using this metrics suite, we assess the health of 11 software engineering conferences over a period of more than 10 years. In general, our findings suggest that software engineering conferences are healthy, but we observe important differences between conferences with a wide scope and those with a more narrow scope. We also find that depending on the chosen health metric, some conferences perform better than others. This knowledge may be used by prospective authors to decide in which conferences to publish, and by conference steering committees or PC chairs to assess their selection process. Keywords: Scientometrics; Software engineering; Conferences; Empirical research

AB - In this article we study the health of software engineering conferences by means of a suite of metrics created for this purpose. The metrics measure stability of the community, openness to new authors, introversion, representativeness of the PC with respect to the authors' community, availability of PC candidates, and scientific prestige. Using this metrics suite, we assess the health of 11 software engineering conferences over a period of more than 10 years. In general, our findings suggest that software engineering conferences are healthy, but we observe important differences between conferences with a wide scope and those with a more narrow scope. We also find that depending on the chosen health metric, some conferences perform better than others. This knowledge may be used by prospective authors to decide in which conferences to publish, and by conference steering committees or PC chairs to assess their selection process. Keywords: Scientometrics; Software engineering; Conferences; Empirical research

U2 - 10.1016/j.scico.2014.01.016

DO - 10.1016/j.scico.2014.01.016

M3 - Article

VL - 89

SP - 251

EP - 272

JO - Science of Computer Programming

JF - Science of Computer Programming

SN - 0167-6423

IS - Part C

ER -