How does walkability change behavior? a comparison between different age groups in the Netherlands

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

27 Citations (Scopus)
204 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Empirical research provides evidence that, in neighborhoods with higher walkability, individuals make more walking trips. However, it is not clear what the exact nature is of the relationships between neighborhood walkability and walking trips, since a higher walking frequency can be explained in different ways. This study examined whether the extra walking trips in better walkable neighborhoods are related primarily to trip generation, destination choice, or transport mode choice and whether this is the same for different age groups. A neighborhood fixed effects regression analysis was conducted in a first step to obtain a walkability measure for each neighborhood in the Netherlands including systematic as well as unobserved effects. Subsequently, the estimated fixed effects were used as walkability data for a path analysis based on a causal model to test the hypotheses stated. The results of the path analysis show direct relationships of neighborhood walkability with trip generation, destination choice, and transport mode choice, after controlling for the mutual relationships between the activity and trip variables. Comparing different age groups (i.e., children, adults, and elderly), the differences found mostly concerned the relationship between neighborhood walkability and trip generation. We concluded therefore that conditions for walkability are not the same for all age groups.

Original languageEnglish
Article number540
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Acknowledgments: This research was supported by the Chinese Scholarship Council (China). We would like to thank the Chinese Scholarship Council for providing the funding for the Ph.D. study.

Funding Information:
Funding: This research was funded by the Chinese Scholarship Council (China), grant number CSC 201807720070.

Funding Information:
This research was funded by the Chinese Scholarship Council (China), grant number CSC 201807720070. This research was supported by the Chinese Scholarship Council (China). We would like to thank the Chinese Scholarship Council for providing the funding for the Ph.D. study.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

Acknowledgments: This research was supported by the Chinese Scholarship Council (China). We would like to thank the Chinese Scholarship Council for providing the funding for the Ph.D. study. Funding: This research was funded by the Chinese Scholarship Council (China), grant number CSC 201807720070. This research was funded by the Chinese Scholarship Council (China), grant number CSC 201807720070. This research was supported by the Chinese Scholarship Council (China). We would like to thank the Chinese Scholarship Council for providing the funding for the Ph.D. study.

FundersFunder number
China Scholarship Council
China Scholarship CouncilCSC 201807720070
China Scholarship Council

    Keywords

    • Age groups
    • Destination choice
    • Mode choice and walking trips
    • Path analysis
    • Trip generation
    • Walkability
    • Models, Theoretical
    • Residence Characteristics
    • Age Factors
    • Humans
    • Walking
    • Netherlands
    • Adult
    • Environment Design
    • Aged
    • Behavior
    • Child

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'How does walkability change behavior? a comparison between different age groups in the Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this