Abstract
Bayesian models of cognition and behavior are particularly promising when they are used in reverse-engineering explanations: explanations that descend from the computational level of analysis to the algorithmic and implementation levels. Unfortunately, it remains unclear exactly how Bayesian models constrain and influence these lower levels of analysis. In this paper, we review and reject two widespread views of Bayesian reverse-engineering, and propose an alternative view according to which Bayesian models at the computational level impose pragmatic constraints that facilitate the generation of testable hypotheses at the algorithmic and implementation levels.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2014) |
| Subtitle of host publication | Cognitive Science Meets Artificial Intelligence: Human and Artificial Agents in Interactive Contexts |
| Publisher | Centre for Cognitive Science |
| Pages | 666-671 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-1-63439-116-0 |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |
| Event | 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2014 - Quebec City, Canada Duration: 23 Jul 2014 → 26 Jul 2014 Conference number: 36 |
Conference
| Conference | 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2014 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | Canada |
| City | Quebec City |
| Period | 23/07/14 → 26/07/14 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How does Bayesian reverse-engineering work?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver