Graph and model transformation tools for model migration : empirical results from the transformation tool contest

L.M. Rose; M. Herrmannsdoerfer; S. Mazanek; P.M.E. Van Gorp; S. Buchwald; T. Horn; E. Kalnina; A. Koch; K. Lano; B. Schätz; M. Wimmer

doi:10.1007/s10270-012-0245-0

Graph and model transformation tools for model migration : empirical results from the transformation tool contest

L.M. Rose
, M. Herrmannsdoerfer
, S. Mazanek
, P.M.E. Van Gorp
, S. Buchwald
, T. Horn
, E. Kalnina
, A. Koch
, K. Lano
, B. Schätz
, M. Wimmer

Information Systems IE&IS

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We describe the results of the Transformation Tool Contest 2010 workshop, in which nine graph and model transformation tools were compared for specifying model migration. The model migration problem—migration of UML activity diagrams from version 1.4 to version 2.2—is non-trivial and practically relevant. The solutions have been compared with respect to several criteria: correctness, conciseness, understandability, appropriateness, maturity and support for extensions to the core migration task. We describe in detail the comparison method, and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the solutions with a special focus on the differences between graph and model transformation for model migration. The comparison results demonstrate.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	323-359
Number of pages	36
Journal	Software and Systems Modeling
Volume	13
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-012-0245-0
Publication status	Published - 2014

Access to Document

10.1007/s10270-012-0245-0

Cite this

@article{ab3521b87f604023817281ee6ff47a39,

title = "Graph and model transformation tools for model migration : empirical results from the transformation tool contest",

abstract = "We describe the results of the Transformation Tool Contest 2010 workshop, in which nine graph and model transformation tools were compared for specifying model migration. The model migration problem—migration of UML activity diagrams from version 1.4 to version 2.2—is non-trivial and practically relevant. The solutions have been compared with respect to several criteria: correctness, conciseness, understandability, appropriateness, maturity and support for extensions to the core migration task. We describe in detail the comparison method, and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the solutions with a special focus on the differences between graph and model transformation for model migration. The comparison results demonstrate.",

author = "L.M. Rose and M. Herrmannsdoerfer and S. Mazanek and \{Van Gorp\}, P.M.E. and S. Buchwald and T. Horn and E. Kalnina and A. Koch and K. Lano and B. Sch{\"a}tz and M. Wimmer",

year = "2014",

doi = "10.1007/s10270-012-0245-0",

language = "English",

volume = "13",

pages = "323--359",

journal = "Software and Systems Modeling",

issn = "1619-1366",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Graph and model transformation tools for model migration : empirical results from the transformation tool contest

AU - Rose, L.M.

AU - Herrmannsdoerfer, M.

AU - Mazanek, S.

AU - Van Gorp, P.M.E.

AU - Buchwald, S.

AU - Horn, T.

AU - Kalnina, E.

AU - Koch, A.

AU - Lano, K.

AU - Schätz, B.

AU - Wimmer, M.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - We describe the results of the Transformation Tool Contest 2010 workshop, in which nine graph and model transformation tools were compared for specifying model migration. The model migration problem—migration of UML activity diagrams from version 1.4 to version 2.2—is non-trivial and practically relevant. The solutions have been compared with respect to several criteria: correctness, conciseness, understandability, appropriateness, maturity and support for extensions to the core migration task. We describe in detail the comparison method, and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the solutions with a special focus on the differences between graph and model transformation for model migration. The comparison results demonstrate.

AB - We describe the results of the Transformation Tool Contest 2010 workshop, in which nine graph and model transformation tools were compared for specifying model migration. The model migration problem—migration of UML activity diagrams from version 1.4 to version 2.2—is non-trivial and practically relevant. The solutions have been compared with respect to several criteria: correctness, conciseness, understandability, appropriateness, maturity and support for extensions to the core migration task. We describe in detail the comparison method, and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the solutions with a special focus on the differences between graph and model transformation for model migration. The comparison results demonstrate.

U2 - 10.1007/s10270-012-0245-0

DO - 10.1007/s10270-012-0245-0

M3 - Article

SN - 1619-1366

VL - 13

SP - 323

EP - 359

JO - Software and Systems Modeling

JF - Software and Systems Modeling

IS - 1

ER -

Graph and model transformation tools for model migration : empirical results from the transformation tool contest

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this