Governance mode choice in collaborative PhD projects

N. Salimi, R.N.A. Bekkers, K. Frenken

Research output: Book/ReportReportAcademic

107 Downloads (Pure)


Joint PhD projects are a promising form of research collaboration, connecting universities to firms and public research organizations. Entering into such collaborations, however, requires decisions in terms of governance. This paper investigates how a university and its partners govern such projects, including decision-making, daily management and disclosure policies. Earlier studies show that shared governance modes have had a higher success rate than centralized governance modes. Nevertheless, more than two thirds of the 191 joint PhD projects we investigated opted for centralized rather than shared governance. Our findings show that: (i) geographical and cognitive distance render the adoption of a shared governance mode less likely; (ii) the partner controlling critical resources tends to centralize governance, and (iii) partnering firms are more likely to put restrictions on publication output than public research organizations. We therefore recommend that universities and their partners take these aspects into account when selecting such projects.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationEindhoven
PublisherTechnische Universiteit Eindhoven
Number of pages22
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Publication series

NameECIS working paper series


Dive into the research topics of 'Governance mode choice in collaborative PhD projects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this