Good practice policies to bridge the emissions gap in key countries

Luiz Bernardo Baptista (Corresponding author), Roberto Schaeffer, Heleen L. van Soest, Panagiotis Fragkos, Pedro R.R. Rochedo, Detlef van Vuuren, Retno Gumilang Dewi, Gokul Iyer, Kejun Jiang, Maria Kannavou, Nick Macaluso, Ken Oshiro, Chan Park, Luke J. Reedman, George Safonov, Swapnil Shekhar, Ucok Siagian, Kavita Surana, Chai Qimin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)
69 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

One key aspect of the Paris Agreement is the goal to limit the global average temperature increase to well below 2 °C by the end of the century. To achieve the Paris Agreement goals, countries need to submit, and periodically update, their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). Recent studies show that NDCs and currently implemented national policies are not sufficient to cover the ambition level of the temperature limit agreed upon in the Paris Agreement, meaning that we need to collectively increase climate action to stabilize global warming at levels considered safe. This paper explores the generalization of previously adopted good practice policies (GPPs) to bridge the emissions gap between current policies, NDCs ambitions and a well below 2 °C world, facilitating the creation of a bridge trajectory in key major-emitting countries. These GPPs are implemented in eleven well-established national Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) for Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, European Union (EU), India, Indonesia, Japan, Russia, South Korea, and the United States, that provide least-cost, low-carbon scenarios up to 2050. Results show that GPPs can play an important role in each region, with energy supply policies appearing as one of the biggest contributors to the reduction of carbon emissions. However, GPPs by themselves are not enough to close the emission gap, and as such more will be needed in these economies to collectively increase climate action to stabilize global warming at levels considered safe.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102472
Number of pages9
JournalGlobal Environmental Change
Volume73
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2022

Funding

This study benefited from the financial support of the European Union via the COMMIT project (Climate pOlicy assessment and Mitigation Modeling to Integrate national and global Transition Pathways), financed by Directorate General Climate Action (DG CLIMA) and EuropeAid under grant agreement No. 21020701/2017/770447/SER/CLIMA.C.1 EuropeAid/138417/DH/SER/MulitOC (COMMIT). KO was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP20K14860, the Environmental Research and Technology Development Fund ( JPMEERF 20211001 ) of the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan. CP was supported by The International Research & Development Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT(NRF2019K1A3A1A7811297311). LR and CSIRO acknowledges assistance from KanORS-EMR and Climate Works Australia in prior development of the TIMES-AUS model used in this paper. LB and RS acknowledge the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for funding provided.

FundersFunder number
European Commission
Japan Society for the Promotion of ScienceJP20K14860
National Research Foundation of Korea

    Keywords

    • Bridge scenarios
    • Climate policy
    • Good practice policies
    • Integrated assessment models
    • Nationally determined contributions

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Good practice policies to bridge the emissions gap in key countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this