Goals, strategies, and group performance : some limits of goal setting in groups

H. Mierlo, van, P.A.M. Kleingeld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Based on Mitchell and Silver’s (1990) tower-building paradigm, the authors performed two experiments on multilevel quantity goals, strategies, and performance in task-interdependent groups. The study compared four goal types: IG (individual goal), GG (group goal), IG + GG (individual + group goal), and NSG (nonspecific goal). IG yielded low cooperation and performance, whereas, unexpectedly, NSG yielded high cooperation and performance. To explain this finding, we discerned two goal-setting components: Goal referent (performance-level targeted; individual/group) and goal specificity. Mediation analyses suggest that referent triggers a cooperation/competition mechanism, explaining the lower IG performance, whereas specificity triggers a speed/ accuracy mechanism, explaining the higher NSG performance. We conclude that individual goals can interfere with cooperative processes and group performance, and, for time-constrained interdependent tasks requiring speed and accuracy, specific difficult quantity goals may promote risk taking, thereby obstructing goal attainment.
LanguageEnglish
Pages524-555
Number of pages32
JournalSmall Group Research
Volume41
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Group Processes
Task Performance and Analysis
Risk-Taking
Silver

Cite this

@article{9282d813989c4881aed4fa0a4b13b07a,
title = "Goals, strategies, and group performance : some limits of goal setting in groups",
abstract = "Based on Mitchell and Silver’s (1990) tower-building paradigm, the authors performed two experiments on multilevel quantity goals, strategies, and performance in task-interdependent groups. The study compared four goal types: IG (individual goal), GG (group goal), IG + GG (individual + group goal), and NSG (nonspecific goal). IG yielded low cooperation and performance, whereas, unexpectedly, NSG yielded high cooperation and performance. To explain this finding, we discerned two goal-setting components: Goal referent (performance-level targeted; individual/group) and goal specificity. Mediation analyses suggest that referent triggers a cooperation/competition mechanism, explaining the lower IG performance, whereas specificity triggers a speed/ accuracy mechanism, explaining the higher NSG performance. We conclude that individual goals can interfere with cooperative processes and group performance, and, for time-constrained interdependent tasks requiring speed and accuracy, specific difficult quantity goals may promote risk taking, thereby obstructing goal attainment.",
author = "{Mierlo, van}, H. and P.A.M. Kleingeld",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1177/1046496410373628",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "524--555",
journal = "Small Group Research",
issn = "1046-4964",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

Goals, strategies, and group performance : some limits of goal setting in groups. / Mierlo, van, H.; Kleingeld, P.A.M.

In: Small Group Research, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2010, p. 524-555.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Goals, strategies, and group performance : some limits of goal setting in groups

AU - Mierlo, van,H.

AU - Kleingeld,P.A.M.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Based on Mitchell and Silver’s (1990) tower-building paradigm, the authors performed two experiments on multilevel quantity goals, strategies, and performance in task-interdependent groups. The study compared four goal types: IG (individual goal), GG (group goal), IG + GG (individual + group goal), and NSG (nonspecific goal). IG yielded low cooperation and performance, whereas, unexpectedly, NSG yielded high cooperation and performance. To explain this finding, we discerned two goal-setting components: Goal referent (performance-level targeted; individual/group) and goal specificity. Mediation analyses suggest that referent triggers a cooperation/competition mechanism, explaining the lower IG performance, whereas specificity triggers a speed/ accuracy mechanism, explaining the higher NSG performance. We conclude that individual goals can interfere with cooperative processes and group performance, and, for time-constrained interdependent tasks requiring speed and accuracy, specific difficult quantity goals may promote risk taking, thereby obstructing goal attainment.

AB - Based on Mitchell and Silver’s (1990) tower-building paradigm, the authors performed two experiments on multilevel quantity goals, strategies, and performance in task-interdependent groups. The study compared four goal types: IG (individual goal), GG (group goal), IG + GG (individual + group goal), and NSG (nonspecific goal). IG yielded low cooperation and performance, whereas, unexpectedly, NSG yielded high cooperation and performance. To explain this finding, we discerned two goal-setting components: Goal referent (performance-level targeted; individual/group) and goal specificity. Mediation analyses suggest that referent triggers a cooperation/competition mechanism, explaining the lower IG performance, whereas specificity triggers a speed/ accuracy mechanism, explaining the higher NSG performance. We conclude that individual goals can interfere with cooperative processes and group performance, and, for time-constrained interdependent tasks requiring speed and accuracy, specific difficult quantity goals may promote risk taking, thereby obstructing goal attainment.

U2 - 10.1177/1046496410373628

DO - 10.1177/1046496410373628

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 524

EP - 555

JO - Small Group Research

T2 - Small Group Research

JF - Small Group Research

SN - 1046-4964

IS - 5

ER -