Giving meaning to the concept of sustainability in architectural design practices: Setting out the analytical framework of translation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The question of how to give meaning to the concept of sustainability in architectural design practices is highly contested today. Although architects, engineers, clients, politicians, and others seem to agree that sustainability must be addressed, behind this apparent consensus many ambiguities, contradictions, and open questions emerge. Opinions largely vary on how to define the sustainability challenges that architectural design is to respond to, how to align the various stakeholders involved, which scales and elements to consider, and how to transform these questions into design strategies, spatial configurations, and materiality of buildings. These practices cannot be confined merely to technological problem-solving as they essentially mesh a range of cognitive, social, cultural, and material elements. This article draws on the interdisciplinary field of Science and Technology Studies (STS) to set out the transferable analytical framework of 'translation' through which to explain how the concept of sustainability is continuously transformed within contingent, complex, and dynamic architectural design practices as buildings materialize. The framework of translation is particularly well adapted to unpack claims, make them more accountable, and thereby support the larger project of sustainability.

LanguageEnglish
Article number1710
Pages1-15
Number of pages15
JournalSustainability
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 24 May 2018

Fingerprint

architectural design
Architectural design
analytical framework
Sustainable development
sustainability
building
technology studies
science studies
architect
science and technology
politician
engineer
stakeholder
transform
Engineers

Keywords

  • Complexity
  • Controversy
  • Implementation
  • Michel Callon
  • Science and Technology Studies (STS)
  • Sustainability
  • Sustainable architecture
  • Sustainable buildings
  • Sustainable design
  • Translation

Cite this

@article{dd0b68bb88924a55abb262b6454fbf97,
title = "Giving meaning to the concept of sustainability in architectural design practices: Setting out the analytical framework of translation",
abstract = "The question of how to give meaning to the concept of sustainability in architectural design practices is highly contested today. Although architects, engineers, clients, politicians, and others seem to agree that sustainability must be addressed, behind this apparent consensus many ambiguities, contradictions, and open questions emerge. Opinions largely vary on how to define the sustainability challenges that architectural design is to respond to, how to align the various stakeholders involved, which scales and elements to consider, and how to transform these questions into design strategies, spatial configurations, and materiality of buildings. These practices cannot be confined merely to technological problem-solving as they essentially mesh a range of cognitive, social, cultural, and material elements. This article draws on the interdisciplinary field of Science and Technology Studies (STS) to set out the transferable analytical framework of 'translation' through which to explain how the concept of sustainability is continuously transformed within contingent, complex, and dynamic architectural design practices as buildings materialize. The framework of translation is particularly well adapted to unpack claims, make them more accountable, and thereby support the larger project of sustainability.",
keywords = "Complexity, Controversy, Implementation, Michel Callon, Science and Technology Studies (STS), Sustainability, Sustainable architecture, Sustainable buildings, Sustainable design, Translation",
author = "Torsten Schr{\"o}der",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "24",
doi = "10.3390/su10061710",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "1--15",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "6",

}

Giving meaning to the concept of sustainability in architectural design practices : Setting out the analytical framework of translation. / Schröder, Torsten.

In: Sustainability, Vol. 10, No. 6, 1710, 24.05.2018, p. 1-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Giving meaning to the concept of sustainability in architectural design practices

T2 - Sustainability

AU - Schröder,Torsten

PY - 2018/5/24

Y1 - 2018/5/24

N2 - The question of how to give meaning to the concept of sustainability in architectural design practices is highly contested today. Although architects, engineers, clients, politicians, and others seem to agree that sustainability must be addressed, behind this apparent consensus many ambiguities, contradictions, and open questions emerge. Opinions largely vary on how to define the sustainability challenges that architectural design is to respond to, how to align the various stakeholders involved, which scales and elements to consider, and how to transform these questions into design strategies, spatial configurations, and materiality of buildings. These practices cannot be confined merely to technological problem-solving as they essentially mesh a range of cognitive, social, cultural, and material elements. This article draws on the interdisciplinary field of Science and Technology Studies (STS) to set out the transferable analytical framework of 'translation' through which to explain how the concept of sustainability is continuously transformed within contingent, complex, and dynamic architectural design practices as buildings materialize. The framework of translation is particularly well adapted to unpack claims, make them more accountable, and thereby support the larger project of sustainability.

AB - The question of how to give meaning to the concept of sustainability in architectural design practices is highly contested today. Although architects, engineers, clients, politicians, and others seem to agree that sustainability must be addressed, behind this apparent consensus many ambiguities, contradictions, and open questions emerge. Opinions largely vary on how to define the sustainability challenges that architectural design is to respond to, how to align the various stakeholders involved, which scales and elements to consider, and how to transform these questions into design strategies, spatial configurations, and materiality of buildings. These practices cannot be confined merely to technological problem-solving as they essentially mesh a range of cognitive, social, cultural, and material elements. This article draws on the interdisciplinary field of Science and Technology Studies (STS) to set out the transferable analytical framework of 'translation' through which to explain how the concept of sustainability is continuously transformed within contingent, complex, and dynamic architectural design practices as buildings materialize. The framework of translation is particularly well adapted to unpack claims, make them more accountable, and thereby support the larger project of sustainability.

KW - Complexity

KW - Controversy

KW - Implementation

KW - Michel Callon

KW - Science and Technology Studies (STS)

KW - Sustainability

KW - Sustainable architecture

KW - Sustainable buildings

KW - Sustainable design

KW - Translation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047461106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/su10061710

DO - 10.3390/su10061710

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 1

EP - 15

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 6

M1 - 1710

ER -