Full-field identification methods: comparison of FEM updating and integrated DIC

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Full-field identification methods are increasingly used to adequately identify constitutive parameters to describe the mechanical behavior of materials. This research investigates the more recently introduced, one-step method of Integrated Digital Image Correlation (IDIC) with respect to the most commonly used, two-step method of Finite Element Model Updating (FEMU), which uses a subset-based digital image correlation algorithm. To make the comparison as objective as possible, both methods are implemented in the most equivalent manner and use the same FE-model. Various virtual test-cases are studied to assess the performance of both methods when subjected to different error sources: (1) systematic errors, (2) poor initial guesses for the constitutive parameters, (3) image noise, (4) constitutive model errors, and (5) experimental errors. Results show that, despite the mathematical similarity of both methods, IDIC produces less erroneous and more reliable results than FEMU, particularly for more challenging test-cases exhibiting small displacements, complex kinematics, misalignment of the specimen, and image noise.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAdvancement of Optical Methods in Experimental Mechanics, Volume 3
Subtitle of host publicationProceedings of the 2016 Annual Conference on Experimental and Applied Mechanics
EditorsS. Yoshida, L. Lamberti, C. Siammarella
Place of PublicationDordrecht
PublisherSpringer
Pages191-197
Number of pages7
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-319-41600-7
ISBN (Print)978-3-319-41599-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Event2016 SEM International Congress and Exposition on Experimental and Applied Mechanics - Hilton Orlando Lake Buena Vista, Orlando, United States
Duration: 6 Jun 20169 Jun 2016

Publication series

NameConference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series
Volume2017

Conference

Conference2016 SEM International Congress and Exposition on Experimental and Applied Mechanics
CountryUnited States
CityOrlando
Period6/06/169/06/16
OtherDynamic Behavior: Integrating Experimental Mechanics

Fingerprint

Finite element method
Systematic errors
Constitutive models
Set theory
Kinematics

Keywords

  • Finite element model updating
  • Full-field measurement
  • Integrated digital image correlation
  • Inverse methods
  • Parameter identification

Cite this

Ruybalid, A. P., Hoefnagels, J. P. M., van der Sluis, O., & Geers, M. G. D. (2017). Full-field identification methods: comparison of FEM updating and integrated DIC. In S. Yoshida, L. Lamberti, & C. Siammarella (Eds.), Advancement of Optical Methods in Experimental Mechanics, Volume 3: Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Conference on Experimental and Applied Mechanics (pp. 191-197). (Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series ; Vol. 2017). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41600-7_24
Ruybalid, A.P. ; Hoefnagels, J.P.M. ; van der Sluis, O. ; Geers, M.G.D. / Full-field identification methods : comparison of FEM updating and integrated DIC. Advancement of Optical Methods in Experimental Mechanics, Volume 3: Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Conference on Experimental and Applied Mechanics. editor / S. Yoshida ; L. Lamberti ; C. Siammarella. Dordrecht : Springer, 2017. pp. 191-197 (Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series ).
@inproceedings{ad3c4c17af5e4a66967bee68d231e7d7,
title = "Full-field identification methods: comparison of FEM updating and integrated DIC",
abstract = "Full-field identification methods are increasingly used to adequately identify constitutive parameters to describe the mechanical behavior of materials. This research investigates the more recently introduced, one-step method of Integrated Digital Image Correlation (IDIC) with respect to the most commonly used, two-step method of Finite Element Model Updating (FEMU), which uses a subset-based digital image correlation algorithm. To make the comparison as objective as possible, both methods are implemented in the most equivalent manner and use the same FE-model. Various virtual test-cases are studied to assess the performance of both methods when subjected to different error sources: (1) systematic errors, (2) poor initial guesses for the constitutive parameters, (3) image noise, (4) constitutive model errors, and (5) experimental errors. Results show that, despite the mathematical similarity of both methods, IDIC produces less erroneous and more reliable results than FEMU, particularly for more challenging test-cases exhibiting small displacements, complex kinematics, misalignment of the specimen, and image noise.",
keywords = "Finite element model updating, Full-field measurement, Integrated digital image correlation, Inverse methods, Parameter identification",
author = "A.P. Ruybalid and J.P.M. Hoefnagels and {van der Sluis}, O. and M.G.D. Geers",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-41600-7_24",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-319-41599-4",
series = "Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "191--197",
editor = "S. Yoshida and L. Lamberti and C. Siammarella",
booktitle = "Advancement of Optical Methods in Experimental Mechanics, Volume 3",
address = "Germany",

}

Ruybalid, AP, Hoefnagels, JPM, van der Sluis, O & Geers, MGD 2017, Full-field identification methods: comparison of FEM updating and integrated DIC. in S Yoshida, L Lamberti & C Siammarella (eds), Advancement of Optical Methods in Experimental Mechanics, Volume 3: Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Conference on Experimental and Applied Mechanics. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series , vol. 2017, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 191-197, 2016 SEM International Congress and Exposition on Experimental and Applied Mechanics, Orlando, United States, 6/06/16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41600-7_24

Full-field identification methods : comparison of FEM updating and integrated DIC. / Ruybalid, A.P.; Hoefnagels, J.P.M.; van der Sluis, O.; Geers, M.G.D.

Advancement of Optical Methods in Experimental Mechanics, Volume 3: Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Conference on Experimental and Applied Mechanics. ed. / S. Yoshida; L. Lamberti; C. Siammarella. Dordrecht : Springer, 2017. p. 191-197 (Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series ; Vol. 2017).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Full-field identification methods

T2 - comparison of FEM updating and integrated DIC

AU - Ruybalid, A.P.

AU - Hoefnagels, J.P.M.

AU - van der Sluis, O.

AU - Geers, M.G.D.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Full-field identification methods are increasingly used to adequately identify constitutive parameters to describe the mechanical behavior of materials. This research investigates the more recently introduced, one-step method of Integrated Digital Image Correlation (IDIC) with respect to the most commonly used, two-step method of Finite Element Model Updating (FEMU), which uses a subset-based digital image correlation algorithm. To make the comparison as objective as possible, both methods are implemented in the most equivalent manner and use the same FE-model. Various virtual test-cases are studied to assess the performance of both methods when subjected to different error sources: (1) systematic errors, (2) poor initial guesses for the constitutive parameters, (3) image noise, (4) constitutive model errors, and (5) experimental errors. Results show that, despite the mathematical similarity of both methods, IDIC produces less erroneous and more reliable results than FEMU, particularly for more challenging test-cases exhibiting small displacements, complex kinematics, misalignment of the specimen, and image noise.

AB - Full-field identification methods are increasingly used to adequately identify constitutive parameters to describe the mechanical behavior of materials. This research investigates the more recently introduced, one-step method of Integrated Digital Image Correlation (IDIC) with respect to the most commonly used, two-step method of Finite Element Model Updating (FEMU), which uses a subset-based digital image correlation algorithm. To make the comparison as objective as possible, both methods are implemented in the most equivalent manner and use the same FE-model. Various virtual test-cases are studied to assess the performance of both methods when subjected to different error sources: (1) systematic errors, (2) poor initial guesses for the constitutive parameters, (3) image noise, (4) constitutive model errors, and (5) experimental errors. Results show that, despite the mathematical similarity of both methods, IDIC produces less erroneous and more reliable results than FEMU, particularly for more challenging test-cases exhibiting small displacements, complex kinematics, misalignment of the specimen, and image noise.

KW - Finite element model updating

KW - Full-field measurement

KW - Integrated digital image correlation

KW - Inverse methods

KW - Parameter identification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988697932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-41600-7_24

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-41600-7_24

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84988697932

SN - 978-3-319-41599-4

T3 - Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series

SP - 191

EP - 197

BT - Advancement of Optical Methods in Experimental Mechanics, Volume 3

A2 - Yoshida, S.

A2 - Lamberti, L.

A2 - Siammarella, C.

PB - Springer

CY - Dordrecht

ER -

Ruybalid AP, Hoefnagels JPM, van der Sluis O, Geers MGD. Full-field identification methods: comparison of FEM updating and integrated DIC. In Yoshida S, Lamberti L, Siammarella C, editors, Advancement of Optical Methods in Experimental Mechanics, Volume 3: Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Conference on Experimental and Applied Mechanics. Dordrecht: Springer. 2017. p. 191-197. (Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series ). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41600-7_24