Four Perspectives on What Matters for the Ethics of Automated Vehicles

Geoff Keeling, Katherine Evans, Sarah M. Thornton, Giulio Mecacci, Filippo Santoni de Sio

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ethical discussion on automated vehicles (AVs) has for the most part focused on what morality requires in AV collisions which present moral dilemmas. This discussion has been challenged for its failure to address the various kinds of risk and uncertainty which we can expect to arise in AV collisions; and for overlooking certain morally relevant facts which are unique to the context of AVs. We take these criticisms as a starting point and outline four perspectives on what matters for the ethics of AVs: risk and uncertainty, value sensitive design, partiality towards passengers and meaningful human control.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationRoad Vehicle Automation 6
EditorsGereon Meyer, Sven Beiker
PublisherSpringer
Pages49-60
Number of pages12
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-030-22933-7
ISBN (Print)978-3-030-22932-0, 978-3-030-22935-1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Jun 2019
Externally publishedYes
EventAutomated Vehicles Symposium 2018, AVS 2018 - San Francisco, United States
Duration: 9 Jul 201812 Jul 2018

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Mobility (LNMOB)
ISSN (Print)2196-5544
ISSN (Electronic)2196-5552

Conference

ConferenceAutomated Vehicles Symposium 2018, AVS 2018
Abbreviated titleAVS 2018
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CitySan Francisco
Period9/07/1812/07/18

Keywords

  • Autonomous vehicles
  • Ethics of risk
  • Ethics of technology
  • Meaningful human control
  • Robot ethics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Four Perspectives on What Matters for the Ethics of Automated Vehicles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this