Forecasting Publication’s Success Using Machine Learning

Measuring the success and impact of a scientific publication is an important, thus controversial matter. Despite all the criticism, it is widespread that citation counts is considered a popular indication of a publication‘s success. Therefore, in this paper, we use a machine learning framework to test the ability of alternative metrics (altmetrics) to predict the future impact of papers reflected in the citation counts. To achieve the experiment, we extracted 7,588 papers from 10 computer science journals. To build the feature space for the prediction problem, 14 different altmetric indices were collected, 3 feature selection approaches, namely, Variance threshold, Pearson’s Correlation, and Mutual information method, were used to minimize the feature space and rank the features according to their contribution to the original dataset. To identify the classification performance of these features, three classifiers were used: Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machines. According to the experimental data, altmetrics can predict future citations and the most useful altmetrics indications are social media count, tweets, news count, capture count, and full-text view, with Random Forest outperforming the other classifiers.