Finite element deletion and topology optimisation for building structural optimisation

H. Hofmeyer, J.M. Davila Delgado

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Buildings would not exist without a structural design. Although mechanical, electrical, and computer facilities now often put a much higher burden on the financial costs of a building than the structural design -related to both engineering and construction costs-, a building structure is unique in the sense that structural issues cannot be permitted, as they are lifethreatening. Thus a building structure should primarily be safe, but nevertheless also economical. To help structural engineers with these goals, computer-assisted methods exist to determine the stress distribution in structural designs (e.g. the finite element method) and to optimise design components (e.g. topology optimisation). However, research on the optimisation of (complete) building structures is still relatively rare. In this paper, two methods for structural design optimisation have been compared for the application to complete building structural designs. This via a so-called research engine, in which spatial designs are transformed in structural designs, and vice versa, to investigate preliminary design processes. The two methods are compared for their effectiveness of optimisation, which shows that the method topology optimisation is more effective than the method element deletion, and if structural optimisation is used for exploring a solution space and evaluating the design process outcomes, this is an important conclusion. Besides, during topology optimisation a structural design remains stable, whereas element deletion may render the design unstable. However, when structural optimisation is used to study the primarily design process (e.g. via the research engine), the qualitative effects of both methods can be compared, and element deletion is computationally more efficient. Because even an unstable design will be usable in the research engine, for this case the method of element deletion is preferred.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 19th CIB World Building Congress, 5-9 May 2013, Brisbane
EditorsS. Kajewski, K. Manley, K. Hampson
Place of PublicationBrisbane
PublisherThe School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
Pages1-12
ISBN (Print)978-0-9875542-0-8
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Event19th CIB World Building Congress, May 5-9, 2013, Brisbane, Australia - Brisbane, Australia
Duration: 5 May 20139 May 2013

Conference

Conference19th CIB World Building Congress, May 5-9, 2013, Brisbane, Australia
CountryAustralia
CityBrisbane
Period5/05/139/05/13
Other"Construction and Society"

Fingerprint

Structural optimization
Shape optimization
Structural design
Engines
Stress concentration
Costs
Finite element method
Engineers

Cite this

Hofmeyer, H., & Davila Delgado, J. M. (2013). Finite element deletion and topology optimisation for building structural optimisation. In S. Kajewski, K. Manley, & K. Hampson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th CIB World Building Congress, 5-9 May 2013, Brisbane (pp. 1-12). Brisbane: The School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Hofmeyer, H. ; Davila Delgado, J.M. / Finite element deletion and topology optimisation for building structural optimisation. Proceedings of the 19th CIB World Building Congress, 5-9 May 2013, Brisbane. editor / S. Kajewski ; K. Manley ; K. Hampson. Brisbane : The School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, 2013. pp. 1-12
@inproceedings{ac9a6b40e5524595a59aad0249017813,
title = "Finite element deletion and topology optimisation for building structural optimisation",
abstract = "Buildings would not exist without a structural design. Although mechanical, electrical, and computer facilities now often put a much higher burden on the financial costs of a building than the structural design -related to both engineering and construction costs-, a building structure is unique in the sense that structural issues cannot be permitted, as they are lifethreatening. Thus a building structure should primarily be safe, but nevertheless also economical. To help structural engineers with these goals, computer-assisted methods exist to determine the stress distribution in structural designs (e.g. the finite element method) and to optimise design components (e.g. topology optimisation). However, research on the optimisation of (complete) building structures is still relatively rare. In this paper, two methods for structural design optimisation have been compared for the application to complete building structural designs. This via a so-called research engine, in which spatial designs are transformed in structural designs, and vice versa, to investigate preliminary design processes. The two methods are compared for their effectiveness of optimisation, which shows that the method topology optimisation is more effective than the method element deletion, and if structural optimisation is used for exploring a solution space and evaluating the design process outcomes, this is an important conclusion. Besides, during topology optimisation a structural design remains stable, whereas element deletion may render the design unstable. However, when structural optimisation is used to study the primarily design process (e.g. via the research engine), the qualitative effects of both methods can be compared, and element deletion is computationally more efficient. Because even an unstable design will be usable in the research engine, for this case the method of element deletion is preferred.",
author = "H. Hofmeyer and {Davila Delgado}, J.M.",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-0-9875542-0-8",
pages = "1--12",
editor = "S. Kajewski and K. Manley and K. Hampson",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 19th CIB World Building Congress, 5-9 May 2013, Brisbane",
publisher = "The School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia",

}

Hofmeyer, H & Davila Delgado, JM 2013, Finite element deletion and topology optimisation for building structural optimisation. in S Kajewski, K Manley & K Hampson (eds), Proceedings of the 19th CIB World Building Congress, 5-9 May 2013, Brisbane. The School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, Brisbane, pp. 1-12, 19th CIB World Building Congress, May 5-9, 2013, Brisbane, Australia, Brisbane, Australia, 5/05/13.

Finite element deletion and topology optimisation for building structural optimisation. / Hofmeyer, H.; Davila Delgado, J.M.

Proceedings of the 19th CIB World Building Congress, 5-9 May 2013, Brisbane. ed. / S. Kajewski; K. Manley; K. Hampson. Brisbane : The School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, 2013. p. 1-12.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Finite element deletion and topology optimisation for building structural optimisation

AU - Hofmeyer, H.

AU - Davila Delgado, J.M.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Buildings would not exist without a structural design. Although mechanical, electrical, and computer facilities now often put a much higher burden on the financial costs of a building than the structural design -related to both engineering and construction costs-, a building structure is unique in the sense that structural issues cannot be permitted, as they are lifethreatening. Thus a building structure should primarily be safe, but nevertheless also economical. To help structural engineers with these goals, computer-assisted methods exist to determine the stress distribution in structural designs (e.g. the finite element method) and to optimise design components (e.g. topology optimisation). However, research on the optimisation of (complete) building structures is still relatively rare. In this paper, two methods for structural design optimisation have been compared for the application to complete building structural designs. This via a so-called research engine, in which spatial designs are transformed in structural designs, and vice versa, to investigate preliminary design processes. The two methods are compared for their effectiveness of optimisation, which shows that the method topology optimisation is more effective than the method element deletion, and if structural optimisation is used for exploring a solution space and evaluating the design process outcomes, this is an important conclusion. Besides, during topology optimisation a structural design remains stable, whereas element deletion may render the design unstable. However, when structural optimisation is used to study the primarily design process (e.g. via the research engine), the qualitative effects of both methods can be compared, and element deletion is computationally more efficient. Because even an unstable design will be usable in the research engine, for this case the method of element deletion is preferred.

AB - Buildings would not exist without a structural design. Although mechanical, electrical, and computer facilities now often put a much higher burden on the financial costs of a building than the structural design -related to both engineering and construction costs-, a building structure is unique in the sense that structural issues cannot be permitted, as they are lifethreatening. Thus a building structure should primarily be safe, but nevertheless also economical. To help structural engineers with these goals, computer-assisted methods exist to determine the stress distribution in structural designs (e.g. the finite element method) and to optimise design components (e.g. topology optimisation). However, research on the optimisation of (complete) building structures is still relatively rare. In this paper, two methods for structural design optimisation have been compared for the application to complete building structural designs. This via a so-called research engine, in which spatial designs are transformed in structural designs, and vice versa, to investigate preliminary design processes. The two methods are compared for their effectiveness of optimisation, which shows that the method topology optimisation is more effective than the method element deletion, and if structural optimisation is used for exploring a solution space and evaluating the design process outcomes, this is an important conclusion. Besides, during topology optimisation a structural design remains stable, whereas element deletion may render the design unstable. However, when structural optimisation is used to study the primarily design process (e.g. via the research engine), the qualitative effects of both methods can be compared, and element deletion is computationally more efficient. Because even an unstable design will be usable in the research engine, for this case the method of element deletion is preferred.

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 978-0-9875542-0-8

SP - 1

EP - 12

BT - Proceedings of the 19th CIB World Building Congress, 5-9 May 2013, Brisbane

A2 - Kajewski, S.

A2 - Manley, K.

A2 - Hampson, K.

PB - The School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia

CY - Brisbane

ER -

Hofmeyer H, Davila Delgado JM. Finite element deletion and topology optimisation for building structural optimisation. In Kajewski S, Manley K, Hampson K, editors, Proceedings of the 19th CIB World Building Congress, 5-9 May 2013, Brisbane. Brisbane: The School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. 2013. p. 1-12