Abstract
Exploratory graph analysis (EGA) is a commonly applied technique intended to help social scientists discover latent variables. Yet, the results can be influenced by the methodological decisions the researcher makes along the way. In this article, we focus on the choice regarding the number of factors to retain: We compare the performance of the recently developed EGA with various traditional factor retention criteria. We use both continuous and binary data, as evidence regarding the accuracy of such criteria in the latter case is scarce. Simulation results, based on scenarios resulting from varying sample size, communalities from major factors, interfactor correlations, skewness, and correlation measure, show that EGA outperforms the traditional factor retention criteria considered in most cases in terms of bias and accuracy. In addition, we show that factor retention decisions for binary data are preferably made using Pearson, instead of tetrachoric, correlations, which is contradictory to popular belief.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 880-910 |
Number of pages | 31 |
Journal | Educational and Psychological Measurement |
Volume | 82 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2022 |
Keywords
- binary data
- exploratory factor analysis
- exploratory graph analysis
- factor retention
- simulation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Exploratory Graph Analysis for Factor Retention: Simulation Results for Continuous and Binary Data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Datasets
-
Exploratory Graph Analysis for Factor Retention: Simulation Results for Continuous and Binary Data
Cosemans, T. (Creator), Rosseel, Y. (Creator) & Gelper, S. (Creator), SAGE Journals, 29 Dec 2021
DOI: 10.25384/sage.c.5770005, https://sage.figshare.com/collections/Exploratory_Graph_Analysis_for_Factor_Retention_Simulation_Results_for_Continuous_and_Binary_Data/5770005
Dataset