Evaluation of the image quality and validity of handheld echocardiography for stroke volume and left ventricular ejection fraction quantification: a method comparison study

Frederique M. de Raat (Corresponding author), Joris van Houte, Leon J. Montenij, Sjoerd Bouwmeester, Suzanne E.A. Felix, Peter Bingley, Esmée C. de Boer, Patrick Houthuizen, R. Arthur Bouwman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

30 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Bedside quantification of stroke volume (SV) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is valuable in hemodynamically compromised patients. Miniaturized handheld ultrasound (HAND) devices are now available for clinical use. However, the performance level of HAND devices for quantified cardiac assessment is yet unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the validity of HAND measurements with standard echocardiography (SE) and three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE). Thirty-six patients were scanned with HAND, SE and 3DE. LVEF and SV quantification was done with automated software for the HAND, SE and 3DE dataset. The image quality of HAND and SE was evaluated by scoring segmental endocardial border delineation (2 = good, 1 = poor, 0 = invisible). LVEF and SV of HAND was evaluated against SE and 3DE using correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. The correlation, bias, and limits of agreement (LOA) between HAND and SE were 0.68 [0.46:0.83], 1.60% [- 2.18:5.38], and 8.84% [- 9.79:12.99] for LVEF, and 0.91 [0.84:0.96], 1.32 ml [- 0.36:4.01], 15.54 ml [- 18.70:21.35] for SV, respectively. Correlation, bias, and LOA between HAND and 3DE were 0.55 [0.6:0.74], - 0.56% [- 2.27:1.1], and 9.88% [- 13.29:12.17] for LVEF, and 0.79 [0.62:0.89], 6.78 ml [2.34:11.21], 12.14 ml [- 26.32:39.87] for SV, respectively. The image quality scores were 9.42 ± 2.0 for the apical four chamber views of the HAND dataset and 10.49 ± 1.7 for the SE dataset and (P < 0.001). Clinically acceptable accuracy, precision, and image quality was demonstrated for HAND measurements compared to SE. In comparison to 3DE, HAND showed a clinically acceptable accuracy and precision for LVEF quantification.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)15-25
Number of pages11
JournalThe International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
Volume40
Issue number1
Early online date10 Oct 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2024

Funding

The authors are grateful to the ultrasound technicians of the cardiology department of the Catharina hospital for their assistance and support in the acquisition of ultrasound data during this study.

Keywords

  • Handheld echocardiography
  • Hemodynamic monitoring
  • Left ventricle ejection fraction
  • Point of care ultrasound
  • Stroke volume

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of the image quality and validity of handheld echocardiography for stroke volume and left ventricular ejection fraction quantification: a method comparison study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this