Evaluation of models of sequestration flow in coronary arteries - Physiology versus anatomy?

Daniel J. Taylor (Corresponding author), Harry Saxton, Ian Halliday, Tom Newman, Jeroen Feher, Rebecca Gosling, Andrew J. Narracott, Denise van Kemenade, Marcel van't Veer, Pim A.L. Tonino, Michel Rochette, D. Rodney Hose, Julian P. Gunn, Paul D. Morris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Myocardial ischaemia results from insufficient coronary blood flow. Computed virtual fractional flow reserve (vFFR) allows quantification of proportional flow loss without the need for invasive pressure-wire testing. In the current study, we describe a novel, conductivity model of side branch flow, referred to as ‘leak’. This leak model is a function of taper and local pressure, the latter of which may change radically when focal disease is present. This builds upon previous techniques, which either ignore side branch flow, or rely purely on anatomical factors. This study aimed to describe a new, conductivity model of side branch flow and compare this with established anatomical models. Methods and results: The novel technique was used to quantify vFFR, distal absolute flow (Qd) and microvascular resistance (CMVR) in 325 idealised 1D models of coronary arteries, modelled from invasive clinical data. Outputs were compared to an established anatomical model of flow. The conductivity model correlated and agreed with the reference model for vFFR (r = 0.895, p < 0.0001; +0.02, 95% CI 0.00 to + 0.22), Qd (r = 0.959, p < 0.0001; −5.2 mL/min, 95% CI −52.2 to +13.0) and CMVR (r = 0.624, p < 0.0001; +50 Woods Units, 95% CI −325 to +2549). Conclusion: Agreement between the two techniques was closest for vFFR, with greater proportional differences seen for Qd and CMVR. The conductivity function assumes vessel taper was optimised for the healthy state and that CMVR was not affected by local disease. The latter may be addressed with further refinement of the technique or inferred from complementary image data. The conductivity technique may represent a refinement of current techniques for modelling coronary side-branch flow. Further work is needed to validate the technique against invasive clinical data.

Original languageEnglish
Article number108299
Number of pages14
JournalComputers in Biology and Medicine
Volume173
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2024

Keywords

  • Computational fluid dynamics
  • Coronary modelling
  • Hemodynamics
  • vFFR

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of models of sequestration flow in coronary arteries - Physiology versus anatomy?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this