Abstract
In this paper, a validation approachis presentedto testtheplausibility of computer-generated landscape configurations for use in collaborative spatial plan-making rocesses. Based on user-defined landscape typologies, the computer is able to create geo-referenced plan alternatives at the landscape component detail level. This is expected to be useful, to enable dis-cussion among multiple actors about plan alternatives, at a more comprehensable level of plan visualisation. A validation experiment based on real data (topographic map 1:10000) is designed to prove that the generated landscape configurations are plausible alternatives for hand-made configurations. Plausibility of configurations is unraveled into subjective and objective plausi-bility. The experiment form is: a design quality test, a representativeness test and an evaluation dimensions test.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Digital proceedings of 27th Urban Data Management Symposium |
Editors | M. Rumor |
Place of Publication | Ljubjana |
Pages | 1-13 |
Volume | Part 2-2 |
Publication status | Published - 2009 |
Event | conference; 27th Urban Data Management Symposium; 2009-06-24; 2009-06-26 - Duration: 24 Jun 2009 → 26 Jun 2009 |
Conference
Conference | conference; 27th Urban Data Management Symposium; 2009-06-24; 2009-06-26 |
---|---|
Period | 24/06/09 → 26/06/09 |
Other | 27th Urban Data Management Symposium |