Evaluation of dispersion MRI for improved prostate cancer diagnosis in a multicenter study

Simona Turco, Cristina Lavini, Stijn Heijmink, Jelle Barentsz, Hessel Wijkstra, Massimo Mischi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to compare dispersion MRI and Tofts model (TM) for analysis of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI (DCE-MRI) for localization of prostate cancer and to assess the correlation between quantitative DCE-MRI parameters and tumor grade. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This retrospective multicenter study included 80 patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer who underwent DCE-MRI followed by radical prostatectomy. DCE-MRI parameters were extracted from dispersion MRI analysis (the dispersion parameter [kd], the flux rate [kep], and the intravascular mean transit time) and TM analysis (the forward volume transfer constant [Ktrans], kep, and the extravascular extracellular volume fraction [ve]). ROIs representing benign and malignant tissue were drawn on each DCE-MRI slice according to the histopathologic findings, and the diagnostic performance of the estimated parameters for the diagnosis of prostate cancer was evaluated using fivefold cross-validation and ROC curve analysis. Further analysis was conducted for the two most relevant parameters (i.e., kd [for dispersion MRI] and kep [for TM]), to investigate the correlation between DCE-MRI parameters and tumor grade. RESULTS. DCE-MRI parameters were significantly different between benign and malignant prostate tissue (p < 0.0001). The dispersion MRI parameter kd outperformed all other DCE-MRI parameters for prostate cancer diagnosis, showing the highest area under the ROC curve value (p < 0.0001). Only a weak linear correlation (Pearson r = 0.18; p < 0.05) was found between the dispersion parameter and the Gleason grade group. CONCLUSION. Dispersion MRI outperformed TM analysis, improving the diagnostic performance of quantitative DCE-MRI for prostate cancer localization. Of the DCE-MRI parameters, kd (for dispersion MRI) and kep (for TM) provided only poor characterization of tumor grade.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)W242-W251
JournalAmerican journal of Roentgenology
Volume211
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018

Keywords

  • cancer angiogenesis
  • dynamic contrastenhanced MRI
  • multiparametric MRI
  • pharmacokinetic modeling
  • prostate cancer

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of dispersion MRI for improved prostate cancer diagnosis in a multicenter study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this