Ethics in e-trust and e-trustworthiness : the case of direct computer-patient interfaces

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, I examine the ethics of e-trust and e-trustworthiness in the context of health care, looking at direct computer-patient interfaces (DCPIs), information systems that provide medical information, diagnosis, advice, consenting and/or treatment directly to patients without clinicians as intermediaries. Designers, manufacturers and deployers of such systems have an ethical obligation to provide evidence of their trustworthiness to users. My argument for this claim is based on evidentialism about trust and trustworthiness: the idea that trust should be based on sound evidence of trustworthiness. Evidence of trustworthiness is a broader notion than one might suppose, including not just information about the risks and performance of the system, but also interactional and contextbased information. I suggest some sources of evidence in this broader sense that make it plausible that designers, manufacturers and deployers of DCPIs can provide evidence to users that is cognitively simple, easy to communicate, yet rationally connected with actual trustworthiness.
LanguageEnglish
Pages355-363
Number of pages9
JournalEthics and Information Technology
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

trustworthiness
Interfaces (computer)
moral philosophy
Health care
Information systems
evidence
Acoustic waves
obligation
information system
health care

Cite this

@article{c6d984814118493aa4936262878bcfdf,
title = "Ethics in e-trust and e-trustworthiness : the case of direct computer-patient interfaces",
abstract = "In this paper, I examine the ethics of e-trust and e-trustworthiness in the context of health care, looking at direct computer-patient interfaces (DCPIs), information systems that provide medical information, diagnosis, advice, consenting and/or treatment directly to patients without clinicians as intermediaries. Designers, manufacturers and deployers of such systems have an ethical obligation to provide evidence of their trustworthiness to users. My argument for this claim is based on evidentialism about trust and trustworthiness: the idea that trust should be based on sound evidence of trustworthiness. Evidence of trustworthiness is a broader notion than one might suppose, including not just information about the risks and performance of the system, but also interactional and contextbased information. I suggest some sources of evidence in this broader sense that make it plausible that designers, manufacturers and deployers of DCPIs can provide evidence to users that is cognitively simple, easy to communicate, yet rationally connected with actual trustworthiness.",
author = "P.J. Nickel",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1007/s10676-011-9271-9",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "355--363",
journal = "Ethics and Information Technology",
issn = "1388-1957",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "4",

}

Ethics in e-trust and e-trustworthiness : the case of direct computer-patient interfaces. / Nickel, P.J.

In: Ethics and Information Technology, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2011, p. 355-363.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethics in e-trust and e-trustworthiness : the case of direct computer-patient interfaces

AU - Nickel,P.J.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - In this paper, I examine the ethics of e-trust and e-trustworthiness in the context of health care, looking at direct computer-patient interfaces (DCPIs), information systems that provide medical information, diagnosis, advice, consenting and/or treatment directly to patients without clinicians as intermediaries. Designers, manufacturers and deployers of such systems have an ethical obligation to provide evidence of their trustworthiness to users. My argument for this claim is based on evidentialism about trust and trustworthiness: the idea that trust should be based on sound evidence of trustworthiness. Evidence of trustworthiness is a broader notion than one might suppose, including not just information about the risks and performance of the system, but also interactional and contextbased information. I suggest some sources of evidence in this broader sense that make it plausible that designers, manufacturers and deployers of DCPIs can provide evidence to users that is cognitively simple, easy to communicate, yet rationally connected with actual trustworthiness.

AB - In this paper, I examine the ethics of e-trust and e-trustworthiness in the context of health care, looking at direct computer-patient interfaces (DCPIs), information systems that provide medical information, diagnosis, advice, consenting and/or treatment directly to patients without clinicians as intermediaries. Designers, manufacturers and deployers of such systems have an ethical obligation to provide evidence of their trustworthiness to users. My argument for this claim is based on evidentialism about trust and trustworthiness: the idea that trust should be based on sound evidence of trustworthiness. Evidence of trustworthiness is a broader notion than one might suppose, including not just information about the risks and performance of the system, but also interactional and contextbased information. I suggest some sources of evidence in this broader sense that make it plausible that designers, manufacturers and deployers of DCPIs can provide evidence to users that is cognitively simple, easy to communicate, yet rationally connected with actual trustworthiness.

U2 - 10.1007/s10676-011-9271-9

DO - 10.1007/s10676-011-9271-9

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 355

EP - 363

JO - Ethics and Information Technology

T2 - Ethics and Information Technology

JF - Ethics and Information Technology

SN - 1388-1957

IS - 4

ER -