Erratum: Assessment of induced SAR in children exposed to electromagnetic plane waves between 10 MHz and 5.6 GHz

J.F. Bakker; M.M. Paulides; A. Christ; N. Kuster; Gerard C. van Rhoon

doi:10.1088/0031-9155/56/9/2883

Erratum: Assessment of induced SAR in children exposed to electromagnetic plane waves between 10 MHz and 5.6 GHz

J.F. Bakker, M.M. Paulides, A. Christ, N. Kuster, Gerard C. van Rhoon

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic › peer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this corrigendum, the authors would like to report typographic errors in figures 3 and 4 and to suggest a brief amendment to section 3.1 to avoid further misunderstandings.

- Figures 3 and 4: the y-axis tick should read 0.1 instead of 1 in both figure 3 (top) and figure 4 (top). In figure 3 (top), the title should be changed to 'SARwb' instead of 'SARwb,max'.
- Section 3.1. Numerical uncertainty: the following note should be added at the end of the paragraph or as a footnote: 'In order to obtain a worst-case estimate of the numerical uncertainty (table 4), all components were considered as correlated'.
The authors would like to express their sincere apologies for the errors in the manuscript.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	2883
Number of pages	1
Journal	Physics in Medicine and Biology
Volume	56
Issue number	9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/56/9/2883
Publication status	Published - 7 May 2011
Externally published	Yes

Bibliographical note

Physics in Medicine and Biology (2010) 55 (3115-3130)

Access to Document

10.1088/0031-9155/56/9/2883

Cite this

@article{90c6e218b20c470e90fdc0845ed1876f,

title = "Erratum: Assessment of induced SAR in children exposed to electromagnetic plane waves between 10 MHz and 5.6 GHz",

abstract = "In this corrigendum, the authors would like to report typographic errors in figures 3 and 4 and to suggest a brief amendment to section 3.1 to avoid further misunderstandings.- Figures 3 and 4: the y-axis tick should read 0.1 instead of 1 in both figure 3 (top) and figure 4 (top). In figure 3 (top), the title should be changed to 'SARwb' instead of 'SARwb,max'.- Section 3.1. Numerical uncertainty: the following note should be added at the end of the paragraph or as a footnote: 'In order to obtain a worst-case estimate of the numerical uncertainty (table 4), all components were considered as correlated'.The authors would like to express their sincere apologies for the errors in the manuscript.",

author = "J.F. Bakker and M.M. Paulides and A. Christ and N. Kuster and {van Rhoon}, {Gerard C.}",

note = "Physics in Medicine and Biology (2010) 55 (3115-3130)",

year = "2011",

month = may,

day = "7",

doi = "10.1088/0031-9155/56/9/2883",

language = "English",

volume = "56",

pages = "2883",

journal = "Physics in Medicine and Biology",

issn = "0031-9155",

publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",

number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Erratum

T2 - Assessment of induced SAR in children exposed to electromagnetic plane waves between 10 MHz and 5.6 GHz

AU - Bakker, J.F.

AU - Paulides, M.M.

AU - Christ, A.

AU - Kuster, N.

AU - van Rhoon, Gerard C.

N1 - Physics in Medicine and Biology (2010) 55 (3115-3130)

PY - 2011/5/7

Y1 - 2011/5/7

N2 - In this corrigendum, the authors would like to report typographic errors in figures 3 and 4 and to suggest a brief amendment to section 3.1 to avoid further misunderstandings.- Figures 3 and 4: the y-axis tick should read 0.1 instead of 1 in both figure 3 (top) and figure 4 (top). In figure 3 (top), the title should be changed to 'SARwb' instead of 'SARwb,max'.- Section 3.1. Numerical uncertainty: the following note should be added at the end of the paragraph or as a footnote: 'In order to obtain a worst-case estimate of the numerical uncertainty (table 4), all components were considered as correlated'.The authors would like to express their sincere apologies for the errors in the manuscript.

AB - In this corrigendum, the authors would like to report typographic errors in figures 3 and 4 and to suggest a brief amendment to section 3.1 to avoid further misunderstandings.- Figures 3 and 4: the y-axis tick should read 0.1 instead of 1 in both figure 3 (top) and figure 4 (top). In figure 3 (top), the title should be changed to 'SARwb' instead of 'SARwb,max'.- Section 3.1. Numerical uncertainty: the following note should be added at the end of the paragraph or as a footnote: 'In order to obtain a worst-case estimate of the numerical uncertainty (table 4), all components were considered as correlated'.The authors would like to express their sincere apologies for the errors in the manuscript.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79954584818&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/0031-9155/56/9/2883

DO - 10.1088/0031-9155/56/9/2883

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

AN - SCOPUS:79954584818

SN - 0031-9155

VL - 56

SP - 2883

JO - Physics in Medicine and Biology

JF - Physics in Medicine and Biology

IS - 9

ER -

Erratum: Assessment of induced SAR in children exposed to electromagnetic plane waves between 10 MHz and 5.6 GHz

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Assessment of induced SAR in children exposed to electromagnetic plane waves between 10 MHz and 5.6 GHz

Cite this