Abstract
The purpose of this article is to (i) highlight the flaws in three previously published works [Audsley, 2004a; Audsley, 2004b; Bletsas, 2005] on the worst-case response time analysis for tasks with self-suspensions and (ii) provide straightforward fixes for those flaws, hence rendering the analysis safe.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 2 |
| Pages (from-to) | 02:1-02:20 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Errata for Three Papers (2004-05) on Fixed-Priority Scheduling with Self-Suspensions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver