Equivalence testing for psychological research: a tutorial

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

397 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Psychologists must be able to test both for the presence of an effect and for the absence of an effect. In addition to testing against zero, researchers can use the Two One-Sided Tests (TOST) procedure to test for equivalence and reject the presence of a smallest effect size of interest (SESOI). TOST can be used to determine if an observed effect is surprisingly small, given that a true effect at least as large as the SESOI exists. We explain a range of approaches to determine the SESOI in psychological science, and provide detailed examples of how equivalence tests should be performed and reported. Equivalence tests are an important extension of statistical tools psychologists currently use, and enable researchers to falsify predictions about the presence, and declare the absence, of meaningful effects.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)259-269
JournalAdvances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
Volume1
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

equivalence
psychologist
science

Cite this

@article{3426f59f2cee49fcbe6136b09f28529b,
title = "Equivalence testing for psychological research: a tutorial",
abstract = "Psychologists must be able to test both for the presence of an effect and for the absence of an effect. In addition to testing against zero, researchers can use the Two One-Sided Tests (TOST) procedure to test for equivalence and reject the presence of a smallest effect size of interest (SESOI). TOST can be used to determine if an observed effect is surprisingly small, given that a true effect at least as large as the SESOI exists. We explain a range of approaches to determine the SESOI in psychological science, and provide detailed examples of how equivalence tests should be performed and reported. Equivalence tests are an important extension of statistical tools psychologists currently use, and enable researchers to falsify predictions about the presence, and declare the absence, of meaningful effects.",
author = "D. Lakens and A.M. Scheel and P. Isager",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.17605/OSF.IO/V3ZKT",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "259--269",
journal = "Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science",
issn = "2515-2459",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Equivalence testing for psychological research: a tutorial. / Lakens, D.; Scheel, A.M.; Isager, P.

In: Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2018, p. 259-269.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Equivalence testing for psychological research: a tutorial

AU - Lakens, D.

AU - Scheel, A.M.

AU - Isager, P.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Psychologists must be able to test both for the presence of an effect and for the absence of an effect. In addition to testing against zero, researchers can use the Two One-Sided Tests (TOST) procedure to test for equivalence and reject the presence of a smallest effect size of interest (SESOI). TOST can be used to determine if an observed effect is surprisingly small, given that a true effect at least as large as the SESOI exists. We explain a range of approaches to determine the SESOI in psychological science, and provide detailed examples of how equivalence tests should be performed and reported. Equivalence tests are an important extension of statistical tools psychologists currently use, and enable researchers to falsify predictions about the presence, and declare the absence, of meaningful effects.

AB - Psychologists must be able to test both for the presence of an effect and for the absence of an effect. In addition to testing against zero, researchers can use the Two One-Sided Tests (TOST) procedure to test for equivalence and reject the presence of a smallest effect size of interest (SESOI). TOST can be used to determine if an observed effect is surprisingly small, given that a true effect at least as large as the SESOI exists. We explain a range of approaches to determine the SESOI in psychological science, and provide detailed examples of how equivalence tests should be performed and reported. Equivalence tests are an important extension of statistical tools psychologists currently use, and enable researchers to falsify predictions about the presence, and declare the absence, of meaningful effects.

U2 - 10.17605/OSF.IO/V3ZKT

DO - 10.17605/OSF.IO/V3ZKT

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 259

EP - 269

JO - Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science

JF - Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science

SN - 2515-2459

IS - 2

ER -